Registry › Compare › Airbyte vs Flyte

Airbyte vs Flyte

Flyte leads on trust: 72.3/100 (Grade B) against 63.5/100 (Grade C), a 8.8-point gap. Flyte leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

C Airbyte 63.5

Open-source data movement for ELT pipelines and AI agents — from APIs, databases & files to warehouses, lakes, and AI applications. Both self-hosted and Cloud.

airbytehq/airbyte · #572 overall · #11 Workflow Platforms · coverage C (2/5)

Airbyte doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

B Flyte 72.3

Type-safe, distributed orchestration of agents, ML pipelines, and real-time inference on your k8s — in pure Python with async/await, also other languages (rust, go and ts)

flyteorg/flyte · #311 overall · #7 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Flyte if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+5.9Adoption
+1.6Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.8 against 4.5
+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.8 against 4.5
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

10.6

Safety / IntegrityFlyte +1.6

12.2

12.3

TransparencyFlyte +1.1

13.4

20.0

MaintenanceAirbyte +0.1

19.9

10.4

AdoptionFlyte +5.9

16.3

-0.6

Runtime calibrationFlyte +0.3

-0.3

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Airbyte and Flyte, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Airbyteairbytehq/airbyte	Flyteflyteorg/flyte
HVTrust score	63.5	72.3
Evidence grade	C	B
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#572	#311
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#11	#7
GitHub stars	22.3k	7.8k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.5 / 10	5.8 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	163k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.6	12.2
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.3	13.4
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.9
Adoption / 20	10.4	16.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	extensions	plugins
Provenance drift	—	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Airbyte profile Flyte profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →