Registry › Compare › AIPass vs Open Multi-Agent

AIPass vs Open Multi-Agent

AIPass leads on trust: 87.2/100 (Grade A) against 60.1/100 (Grade C), a 27.1-point gap. AIPass leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

A AIPass 87.2

Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.

AIOSAI/AIPass · #70 overall · #1 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose AIPass if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+10.0Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 5.5
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+2.9Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 5d ago
+1.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 5.5

C Open Multi-Agent 60.1

Self-hosted TypeScript agent runtime with durable approvals and verifiable run records. Own it, approve it, audit it.

open-multi-agent/open-multi-agent · #690 overall · #21 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Open Multi-Agent doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

21.9

Safety / IntegrityAIPass +10.0

11.9

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceAIPass +7.2

10.8

14.9

TransparencyAIPass +1.7

13.2

19.9

MaintenanceAIPass +2.9

17.0

9.7

AdoptionAIPass +0.5

9.2

+2.8

Runtime calibrationAIPass +4.8

-2.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AIPass and Open Multi-Agent, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass	Open Multi-Agentopen-multi-agent/open-multi-agent
HVTrust score	87.2	60.1
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#70	#690
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#1	#21
GitHub stars	311	7.0k
Last updated	1d ago	5d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	7.5 / 10	5.5 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	611/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	21.9	11.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.9	13.2
Maintenance / 20	19.9	17.0
Adoption / 20	9.7	9.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Declared
External providers	1 — OpenAI	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → AIPass profile Open Multi-Agent profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →