RegistryCompare › AIPass vs Concordia

AIPass vs Concordia

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AIPass and Concordia, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

AIPass leads on trust — 86.1/100 (Grade A) vs 62.3/100 (Grade C), a 23.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia
HVTrust score 86.1 62.3
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #41 #290
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems #1 #9
GitHub stars 254 1.6k
Last updated today 6d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10 7.8 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 340/wk 570/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.9 9.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.9 15.1
Maintenance / 20 20.0 14.0
Adoption / 20 9.2 11.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → AIPass profile Concordia profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →