AIPass vs CAMEL
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AIPass and CAMEL, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
AIPass leads on trust — 83.5/100 (Grade A) vs 68.9/100 (Grade B), a 14.6-point gap. Note: AIPass's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass | CAMELcamel-ai/camel |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 83.5 | 68.9 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #46 | #117 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #1 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 247 | 17.5k |
| Last updated | today | 4d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.5 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 189/wk | 17k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.1 | 11.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.9 | 14.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 17.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 8.8 | 15.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI | 15 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, … |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | extensions | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →