Agno vs Vercel AI SDK
Vercel AI SDK leads on trust: 96.2/100 (Grade A) against 87.4/100 (Grade A), a 8.8-point gap. Vercel AI SDK leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
Build, run, and manage agent platforms.
Agno doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
The AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents
Choose Vercel AI SDK if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +3.1Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 4.9
- +2.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 4.9
- +1.3Adoption: 33.7M weekly downloads against 469k
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agno and Vercel AI SDK, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Agnoagno-agi/agno | Vercel AI SDKvercel/ai |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 87.4 | 96.2 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #50 | #2 |
| Rank in Agent Frameworks | #9 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 42.6k | 27.1k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.9 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 469k/wk | 33.7M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.6 | 21.7 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.7 | 14.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.7 | 20.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 18 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Brave Search, … | 1 — OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →