RegistryCompare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs OpenShell

Agent Infra Sandbox vs OpenShell

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and OpenShell, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

OpenShell leads on trust — 70.6/100 (Grade B) vs 54.6/100 (Grade C), a 16.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox OpenShellNVIDIA/OpenShell
HVTrust score 54.6 70.6
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #793 #320
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #9 #5
GitHub stars 5.9k 8.7k
Last updated 4d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10 6.5 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 25k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.9 13.1
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.4 14.0
Maintenance / 20 13.4 20.0
Adoption / 20 9.1 15.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI 3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile OpenShell profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →