Registry › Compare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs OpenSandbox

Agent Infra Sandbox vs OpenSandbox

OpenSandbox leads on trust: 73.2/100 (Grade B) against 49.9/100 (Grade D), a 23.3-point gap. Agent Infra Sandbox leads on supply-chain integrity; OpenSandbox leads on maintenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

D Agent Infra Sandbox 49.9

All-in-One Sandbox for AI Agents that combines Browser, Shell, File, MCP and VSCode Server in a single Docker container.

agent-infra/sandbox · #1011 overall · #10 Sandboxes & Runtimes · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Agent Infra Sandbox if supply-chain integrity matters most.

+2.1Safety / Integrity: 83% of recent commits signed, against 35%

B OpenSandbox 73.2

Secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.

opensandbox-group/OpenSandbox · #293 overall · #4 Sandboxes & Runtimes · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenSandbox if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+11.2Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 50d ago
+8.4Adoption: 16.4k GitHub stars against 6.3k
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

9.9

Safety / IntegrityAgent Infra Sandbox +2.1

7.8

12.4

TransparencyOpenSandbox +0.2

12.6

8.7

MaintenanceOpenSandbox +11.2

19.9

9.1

AdoptionOpenSandbox +8.4

17.5

-1.0

Runtime calibrationOpenSandbox +5.6

+4.6

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and OpenSandbox, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox	OpenSandboxopensandbox-group/OpenSandbox
HVTrust score	49.9	73.2
Evidence grade	D	B
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#1011	#293
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes	#10	#4
GitHub stars	6.3k	16.4k
Last updated	50d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.6 / 10	4.8 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	329k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.9	7.8
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.4	12.6
Maintenance / 20	8.7	19.9
Adoption / 20	9.1	17.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	1 — OpenAI	2 — Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	extensions
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile OpenSandbox profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →