Agent Infra Sandbox vs E2B
E2B leads on trust: 78.5/100 (Grade B) against 49.9/100 (Grade D), a 28.6-point gap. E2B leads on maintenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.
All-in-One Sandbox for AI Agents that combines Browser, Shell, File, MCP and VSCode Server in a single Docker container.
Agent Infra Sandbox doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Open-source, secure environment with real-world tools for enterprise-grade agents.
Choose E2B if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +11.0Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 50d ago
- +9.3Adoption: 14.7k GitHub stars against 6.3k
- +2.4Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 4.6
- +1.9Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 4.6
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and E2B, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox | E2Be2b-dev/e2b |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 49.9 | 78.5 |
| Evidence grade | D | B |
| Coverage grade | C | A |
| Overall rank | #1011 | #198 |
| Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes | #10 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 6.3k | 14.7k |
| Last updated | 50d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.6 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | 2.1M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 9.9 | 12.3 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.4 | 14.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 8.7 | 19.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.1 | 18.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Declared |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 1 — E2B |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →