RegistryCompare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs E2B

Agent Infra Sandbox vs E2B

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and E2B, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

E2B leads on trust — 74.2/100 (Grade B) vs 50.6/100 (Grade C), a 23.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox E2Be2b-dev/e2b
HVTrust score 50.6 74.2
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #308 #83
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #5 #2
GitHub stars 5.6k 13.3k
Last updated 33d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 5.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 982k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.8 10.7
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.5 12.9
Maintenance / 20 9.8 19.5
Adoption / 20 9.0 17.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI 1 — E2B
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile E2B profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →