RegistryCompare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs Container Use

Agent Infra Sandbox vs Container Use

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and Container Use, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Container Use leads on trust — 52.6/100 (Grade C) vs 50.6/100 (Grade C), a 2.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox Container Usedagger/container-use
HVTrust score 50.6 52.6
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #308 #296
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #5 #4
GitHub stars 5.6k 4.0k
Last updated 33d ago 53d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 4.4 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.8 10.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.5 12.2
Maintenance / 20 9.8 8.5
Adoption / 20 9.0 8.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile Container Use profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →