Registry › Compare › Agent Browser vs BrowserOS

Agent Browser vs BrowserOS

Agent Browser leads on trust: 91.3/100 (Grade A) against 66.5/100 (Grade B), a 24.8-point gap. Agent Browser leads on provenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

A Agent Browser 91.3

Browser automation CLI for AI agents

vercel-labs/agent-browser · #16 overall · #3 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Agent Browser if provenance and adoption matter most.

+9.8Adoption: 48.6k GitHub stars against 14.3k
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+7.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 99%
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

B BrowserOS 66.5

🌐 The open-source Agentic browser; alternative to ChatGPT Atlas, Perplexity Comet, Dia.

browseros-ai/BrowserOS · #477 overall · #14 Browser & Computer Use · coverage C (2/5)

BrowserOS doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

18.2

Safety / IntegrityAgent Browser +7.0

11.2

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceAgent Browser +7.2

10.8

12.4

TransparencyBrowserOS +0.4

12.8

19.8

AdoptionAgent Browser +9.8

10.0

+2.9

Runtime calibrationAgent Browser +1.2

+1.7

1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Browser and BrowserOS, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agent Browservercel-labs/agent-browser	BrowserOSbrowseros-ai/BrowserOS
HVTrust score	91.3	66.5
Evidence grade	A	B
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#16	#477
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#3	#14
GitHub stars	48.6k	14.3k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.6 / 10	5.0 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	2.5M/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.2	11.2
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.4	12.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	19.8	10.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Redis	1 — Amazon Bedrock
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Agent Browser profile BrowserOS profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →