Registry › Compare › Agency Swarm vs AIPass

Agency Swarm vs AIPass

AIPass leads on trust: 85.1/100 (Grade A) against 67.7/100 (Grade B), a 17.4-point gap. Agency Swarm leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; AIPass leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance. Note: AIPass's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

B Agency Swarm 67.7

Reliable Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework

VRSEN/agency-swarm · #391 overall · #4 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Agency Swarm if adoption matters most.

+4.4Adoption: 1.1k weekly downloads against 74
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A AIPass 85.1

Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.

AIOSAI/AIPass · #84 overall · #1 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose AIPass if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+12.5Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 70%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+2.4Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 4.5
+0.8Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

Where they differ

9.1

Safety / IntegrityAIPass +12.5

21.6

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceAIPass +7.2

18.0

12.3

TransparencyAIPass +2.4

14.7

19.2

MaintenanceAIPass +0.8

20.0

12.8

AdoptionAgency Swarm +4.4

8.4

+3.5

Runtime calibrationAgency Swarm +1.1

+2.4

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Swarm and AIPass, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency SwarmVRSEN/agency-swarm	AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass
HVTrust score	67.7	85.1
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#391	#84
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#4	#1
GitHub stars	4.6k	287
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.5 / 10	7.3 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	1k/wk	74/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.1	21.6
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.3	14.7
Maintenance / 20	19.2	20.0
Adoption / 20	12.8	8.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	2 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenAI	2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	marketplace	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Swarm profile AIPass profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →