Registry › Compare › Agency Agents vs AIPass

Agency Agents vs AIPass

AIPass leads on trust: 87.2/100 (Grade A) against 62.0/100 (Grade C), a 25.2-point gap. Agency Agents leads on adoption; AIPass leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

C Agency Agents 62.0

A complete AI agency at your fingertips - From frontend wizards to Reddit community ninjas, from whimsy injectors to reality checkers. Each agent is a specialized expert with personality, processes, and proven deliverables.

msitarzewski/agency-agents · #652 overall · #19 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Agency Agents if adoption matters most.

+2.8Adoption: 168.4k GitHub stars against 317

A AIPass 87.2

Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.

AIOSAI/AIPass · #70 overall · #1 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose AIPass if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+14.9Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 23%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+2.4Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 4.7
+0.7Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 6d ago

Where they differ

7.0

Safety / IntegrityAIPass +14.9

21.9

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceAIPass +7.2

18.0

12.5

TransparencyAIPass +2.4

14.9

19.2

MaintenanceAIPass +0.7

19.9

12.5

AdoptionAgency Agents +2.8

9.7

+0.0

Runtime calibrationAIPass +2.8

+2.8

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Agents and AIPass, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency Agentsmsitarzewski/agency-agents	AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass
HVTrust score	62.0	87.2
Evidence grade	C	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#652	#70
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#19	#1
GitHub stars	168.4k	317
Last updated	6d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.7 / 10	7.5 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	—	638/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	7.0	21.9
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.5	14.9
Maintenance / 20	19.2	19.9
Adoption / 20	12.5	9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	—	1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Agents profile AIPass profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →