Registry › Compare › Agency Agents vs AIPass

Agency Agents vs AIPass

AIPass leads on trust: 85.3/100 (Grade A) against 64.1/100 (Grade C), a 21.2-point gap. Agency Agents leads on adoption; AIPass leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

C Agency Agents 64.1

A complete AI agency at your fingertips - From frontend wizards to Reddit community ninjas, from whimsy injectors to reality checkers. Each agent is a specialized expert with personality, processes, and proven deliverables.

msitarzewski/agency-agents · #513 overall · #10 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Agency Agents if adoption matters most.

+3.7Adoption: 155.1k GitHub stars against 285

A AIPass 85.3

Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.

AIOSAI/AIPass · #80 overall · #1 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose AIPass if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+10.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 97%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+2.5Maintenance
+2.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.3 against 4.8

Where they differ

10.8

Safety / IntegrityAIPass +10.8

21.6

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceAIPass +7.2

18.0

12.6

TransparencyAIPass +2.1

14.7

17.4

MaintenanceAIPass +2.5

19.9

12.5

AdoptionAgency Agents +3.7

8.8

+0.0

Runtime calibrationAIPass +2.3

+2.3

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Agents and AIPass, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency Agentsmsitarzewski/agency-agents	AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass
HVTrust score	64.1	85.3
Evidence grade	C	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#513	#80
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#10	#1
GitHub stars	155.1k	285
Last updated	1d ago	2d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.8 / 10	7.3 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	—	163/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.8	21.6
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.6	14.7
Maintenance / 20	17.4	19.9
Adoption / 20	12.5	8.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	—	2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	extensions
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Agents profile AIPass profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →