Best Open-Source Voice & Conversational: LiveKit Agents vs Qwen Audio Agent
A data-backed comparison of the top two voice & conversational on HVTracker, built from public trust signals rather than stars alone.
Short answer: LiveKit Agents currently leads Qwen Audio Agent on HVTracker's evidence-weighted trust score: 92.5 vs 86.7/100. This is not a popularity ranking; it combines supply-chain safety, identity/provenance, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.
LiveKit Agents
A framework for building realtime voice AI agents 🤖🎙️📹
Qwen Audio Agent
A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents
LiveKit Agents vs Qwen Audio Agent: trust signal breakdown
Both projects are tracked in the Voice & Conversational category, but they do not expose the same evidence. The table below compares the public signals that feed HVTrust.
| Signal | LiveKit Agents | Qwen Audio Agent |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 92.5 | 86.7 |
| Safety / Integrity | 21.0/25 | 19.8/25 |
| Identity / Provenance | 18.0/18 | 18.0/18 |
| Transparency | 14.3/17 | 13.4/17 |
| Maintenance | 19.9/20 | 19.4/20 |
| Adoption | 18.0/20 | 11.9/20 |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.8 | 5.8 |
| Signed commits | 100% | 100% |
| Package provenance | Verified | Verified |
Which one should you evaluate first?
If your priority is the most verifiable trust profile today, start with LiveKit Agents. It has the stronger current HVTrust score and ranks higher in Voice & Conversational. If your use case depends on a specific runtime, language, license, or integration model, use the individual profiles rather than the headline score alone.
For production use, the practical checklist is: inspect the security policy, confirm package provenance or release signing where available, review recent maintenance cadence, and compare the exact trust breakdown. HVTracker is meant to reduce the first-pass research burden, not replace your own risk review.