Best Open-Source Browser & Computer Use: agent-device vs OpenClaw
A data-backed comparison of the top two browser & computer use on HVTracker, built from public trust signals rather than stars alone.
Short answer: agent-device currently leads OpenClaw on HVTracker's evidence-weighted trust score: 91.6 vs 90.4/100. This is not a popularity ranking; it combines supply-chain safety, identity/provenance, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.
agent-device
Mobile app automation and verification for AI coding agents. CLI, MCP server, and typed Node.js API for iOS, Android, HarmonyOS, TV, web, macOS, and Linux.
OpenClaw
The AI that really does things. Any OS. Any Platform. The lobster way. 🦞
agent-device vs OpenClaw: trust signal breakdown
Both projects are tracked in the Browser & Computer Use category, but they do not expose the same evidence. The table below compares the public signals that feed HVTrust.
| Signal | agent-device | OpenClaw |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 91.6 | 90.4 |
| Safety / Integrity | 20.4/25 | 19.8/25 |
| Identity / Provenance | 18.0/18 | 18.0/18 |
| Transparency | 14.0/17 | 13.5/17 |
| Maintenance | 20.0/20 | 20.0/20 |
| Adoption | 16.1/20 | 20.0/20 |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.5 | 5.9 |
| Signed commits | 96% | 98% |
| Package provenance | Verified | Verified |
Which one should you evaluate first?
If your priority is the most verifiable trust profile today, start with agent-device. It has the stronger current HVTrust score and ranks higher in Browser & Computer Use. If your use case depends on a specific runtime, language, license, or integration model, use the individual profiles rather than the headline score alone.
For production use, the practical checklist is: inspect the security policy, confirm package provenance or release signing where available, review recent maintenance cadence, and compare the exact trust breakdown. HVTracker is meant to reduce the first-pass research burden, not replace your own risk review.