RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Stagehand

Browser Harness vs Stagehand

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Stagehand, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 89.9/100 (Grade A) vs 60.6/100 (Grade C), a 29.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness Stagehandbrowserbase/stagehand
HVTrust score 89.9 60.6
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #12 #349
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #1 #13
GitHub stars 17.2k 24.1k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 5.0 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 1.8M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.5 18.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.7 12.8
Maintenance / 20 19.3 19.3
Adoption / 20 18.5 10.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 1 — Anthropic 3 — Anthropic, Browserbase, OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Stagehand profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →