RegistryCompare › Browser Harness vs Stagehand

Browser Harness vs Stagehand

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Harness and Stagehand, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Stagehand leads on trust — 88.8/100 (Grade A) vs 87.5/100 (Grade A), a 1.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness Stagehandbrowserbase/stagehand
HVTrust score 87.5 88.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #19 #11
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #2 #1
GitHub stars 16.0k 23.5k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10 5.6 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 1.7M/wk 1.0M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.7 19.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.0 13.3
Maintenance / 20 18.7 19.1
Adoption / 20 18.4 18.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Browserbase, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Browser Harness profile Stagehand profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →