Is ZulipChat MCP Server safe to use?

ZulipChat MCP Server has an HVTrust score of 70.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #331 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for ZulipChat MCP Server?

ZulipChat MCP Server scores 70.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 30 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

ZulipChat MCP Server

akougkas/zulipchat-mcp

ZulipChat MCP Server - A Model Context Protocol server that bridges AI agents with Zulip Chat. Built with FastMCP for lightning-fast performance, featuring comprehensive chat management and intelligent summarization. Transform your Zulip workspace into an AI-powered collaboration hub!

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is ZulipChat MCP Server safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

Provenance Attested

Signed commits 7%

Last push 9d ago

Compare ZulipChat MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: ZulipChat MCP Server scores 70.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #331 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.8/10; 7% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-17. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How ZulipChat MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

#196 SportIQ MCP 70.2 +0.2
#197 Zigbee2MQTT MCP 70.0 ±0
#198 ZulipChat MCP Server 70.0 this agent
#199 Qiskit Code Assistant MCP Server 70.0 ±0
#200 MCP After Effects 70.0 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks ZulipChat MCP Server’s 70.0.

Where the 70.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

70.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ZulipChat MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

13.9 / 25

3.6 above avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.6 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

14.2 / 20

2.1 above avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.6 / 20

0.6 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 19 spots (#349 → #330)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for ZulipChat MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

47.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#198

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-17

9 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

169

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #330

Analysis

Activity Inputs

47.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

8.9 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.8 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

8.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

5.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

4.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 23, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 5

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 8

Common questions about ZulipChat MCP Server

ZulipChat MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does ZulipChat MCP Server publish package provenance?

Yes. ZulipChat MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does ZulipChat MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

ZulipChat MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is ZulipChat MCP Server actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 9 days ago.

What license does ZulipChat MCP Server use?

ZulipChat MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are ZulipChat MCP Server's commits signed?

7% of the last 100 commits to ZulipChat MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

ZulipChat MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to ZulipChat MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-08-12

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini

Maintain ZulipChat MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ZulipChat MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 19 spots (#349 → #330)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 642 spots (#988 → #346)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 43.9pts (25.2 → 69.1)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #988

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#345 → #371)

2026-09-17

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-09-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 145 spots (#490 → #345)

2026-09-17

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.3pts (64.0 → 69.3)

2026-09-17

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 14pts (34 → 48)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#468 → #486)

2026-09-08

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → C

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 134 spots (#336 → #470)

2026-09-08

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.6pts (68.5 → 63.9)

2026-09-08

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 14pts (49 → 35)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#311 → #336)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 62 spots (#243 → #305)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#228 → #243)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#213 → #228)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#201 → #211)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#176 → #201)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.2/10

2026-08-26

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 146 spots (#307 → #161)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.7pts (61.6 → 70.3)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#283 → #303)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#299 → #289)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#277 → #292)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#283 → #268)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#260 → #278)

2026-08-12

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 20 spots (#280 → #260)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#271 → #285)

2026-08-09

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 6pts (49 → 55)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #308

GitHub → PyPI: zulipchat-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/zulipchat-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/zulipchat-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/zulipchat-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/zulipchat-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON