Zenrows MCP

Official ZenRows MCP integration

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
47.7/100
Rank #834 of 1320
Compare Zenrows MCP

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-21 · 14d ago
Recent change
Rank +9

Is Zenrows MCP safe? Zenrows MCP scores 47.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #834 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; 14% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-21. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#813 → #834)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#741 → #813)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#703 → #741)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
47.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#448

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 14:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 14 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
19
Forks
5
Last Push
2026-08-21
14 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
10
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼21
was #813

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

47.7 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Zenrows MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.8 / 25
5.3 above avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
1.2 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
15.2 / 20
3.0 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.1 / 20
3.1 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

47.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
13.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
5.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 1, 2026
Signed Commits
14%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 5
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 5
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 9

Is Zenrows MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Zenrows MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Zenrows MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Zenrows MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Zenrows MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Zenrows MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Zenrows MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.
What license does Zenrows MCP use?
Zenrows MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Zenrows MCP's commits signed?
14% of the last 100 commits to Zenrows MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Zenrows MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Zenrows MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Zenrows MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#813 → #834)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#741 → #813)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#703 → #741)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#674 → #703)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#637 → #674)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#620 → #637)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#579 → #620)
2026-08-28
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 140 spots (#719 → #579)
2026-08-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.4pts (41.8 → 49.2)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#696 → #719)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 96 spots (#600 → #696)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#590 → #600)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#577 → #601)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #577

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 47.7 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/zenrows-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/zenrows-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/zenrows-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/zenrows-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON