Yantrikdb MCP

Persistent cognitive memory for AI agents — drop-in MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf. Temporal decay, contra

MCP Servers Python Grade B Listed MIT
74.9/100
Rank #154 of 1320
Compare Yantrikdb MCP

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-26 · 9d ago
Recent change
Rank +6

Is Yantrikdb MCP safe? Yantrikdb MCP scores 74.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #154 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.8/10; 38% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#177 → #149)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.1pts (72.1 → 75.2)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#144 → #168)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
54.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#76

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 9 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
24
Forks
7
Last Push
2026-08-26
9 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
27
Downloads (7d)
305
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼5
was #149

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

74.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Yantrikdb MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
15.4 / 25
5.8 above avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.6 / 17
0.8 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.2 / 20
5.0 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.7 / 20
in line with avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

54.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
18.1 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.8 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 2, 2026
Signed Commits
38%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 8
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Is Yantrikdb MCP safe?

Yantrikdb MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Yantrikdb MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Yantrikdb MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Yantrikdb MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Yantrikdb MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Yantrikdb MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 9 days ago.
What license does Yantrikdb MCP use?
Yantrikdb MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Yantrikdb MCP's commits signed?
37% of the last 100 commits to Yantrikdb MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Yantrikdb MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Yantrikdb MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Yantrikdb MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 11HVTrust 2Listed 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#177 → #149)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.1pts (72.1 → 75.2)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#144 → #168)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 190 spots (#334 → #144)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.1pts (62.2 → 72.3)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#294 → #316)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#280 → #297)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#295 → #282)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#283 → #294)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#312 → #291)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#291 → #306)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#311 → #291)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#289 → #310)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #292

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 74.9 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/yantrikdb-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/yantrikdb-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/yantrikdb-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/yantrikdb-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON