Writing DNA Skill
写作蒸馏器.skill|蒸馏复刻任意写作风格的 agent skill | Writing DNA Distiller - distill and recreate any writing style as an agent skill
Is Writing DNA Skill safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Writing DNA Skill
How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Writing DNA Skill scores 19.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #383 of 385 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 43% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Writing DNA Skill could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard to 9.0no OSSF Scorecard result yet +37.9 → 56.9 C · #141 of 385
- Sign every commit43% signed today +1.4 → 20.4 D · #380 of 385
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Writing DNA Skill and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/larashero3-dotcom/writing-dna-skill, MIT, last pushed 2026-08-24. 43% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Not checked
No OpenSSF Scorecard result yet, so branch protection, code review and release signing are unverified.
-
Published packages None
No registry package. Writing DNA Skill is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of Writing DNA Skill.
Evidence behind this score
Coverage D: 1 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks (missing)
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Writing DNA Skill’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.
How Writing DNA Skill compares in Agent Skills
- #381 Vox Director 19.6 +0.6
- #382 Attention Span 19.6 +0.6
- #383 Writing DNA Skill 19.0 this agent
- #384 Mono Color Skill 18.4 −0.6
- #385 Claude Code Skill Factory 14.4 −4.6
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Writing DNA Skill’s 19.0.
Where the 19.0 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average
19.0 / 100 · 50.0% confidenceWriting DNA Skill Agent Skills average (385 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
49.1 / 100Common questions about Writing DNA Skill
Does Writing DNA Skill publish package provenance?
Does Writing DNA Skill have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Writing DNA Skill actively maintained?
What license does Writing DNA Skill use?
Are Writing DNA Skill's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain Writing DNA Skill?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Writing DNA Skill from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/writing-dna-skill)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/writing-dna-skill"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/writing-dna-skill.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Skills
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON