Is Webhook MCP Server safe to use?

Webhook MCP Server has an HVTrust score of 68.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #373 of 1343 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Webhook MCP Server?

Webhook MCP Server scores 68.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 12 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Webhook MCP Server

Repository

Website by zebbern

MCP to Capture HTTP requests, emails, and DNS lookups test webhooks, debugg API callbacks

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Webhook MCP Server safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10

Provenance Attested

Signed commits 11%

Last push 28d ago

Advisories None known

Compare Webhook MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Webhook MCP Server scores 68.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #373 of 1343 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 11% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (webhook-mcp-server); last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Webhook MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 4.3 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +9.8 → 78.1 B · #99 of 778
Sign every commit11% signed today +4.5 → 72.8 B · #163 of 778

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

How Webhook MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

#225 Idea Reality MCP 68.4 +0.1
#226 Edinet MCP 68.3 ±0
#227 Webhook MCP Server 68.3 this agent
#228 MCP Probe Kit 68.3 ±0
#229 MCP Accessibility Scanner 68.0 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Webhook MCP Server’s 68.3.

Where the 68.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

68.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Webhook MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

13.4 / 25

3.1 above avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.2 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

14.9 / 20

2.7 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

4.8 / 20

2.5 below avg 7.3

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Webhook MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

46.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#227

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-01

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-03

28 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼6

was #367

Analysis

Activity Inputs

46.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

6.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

21.1 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

15.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

3.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

4.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 30, 2026

Signed Commits

11%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests -1

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Webhook MCP Server

Webhook MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Webhook MCP Server publish package provenance?

Yes. Webhook MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Webhook MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Webhook MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Webhook MCP Server actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 28 days ago.

What license does Webhook MCP Server use?

Webhook MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Webhook MCP Server's commits signed?

11% of the last 100 commits to Webhook MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Webhook MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Webhook MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Webhook MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Webhook MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 618 spots (#974 → #356)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 43.3pts (25.4 → 68.7)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #974

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#331 → #345)

2026-09-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#317 → #329)

2026-09-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#302 → #313)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#264 → #282)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 74 spots (#183 → #257)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank rose 25 spots (#208 → #183)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 74 spots (#282 → #208)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.8pts (65.8 → 70.6)

2026-09-03

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 9pts (44 → 52)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#247 → #277)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#242 → #255)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-08-26

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 140 spots (#369 → #229)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.1pts (58.1 → 66.2)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#348 → #365)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#363 → #347)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#348 → #363)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#364 → #352)

2026-08-16

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #364

GitHub → Website → PyPI: webhook-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/webhook-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/webhook-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/webhook-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/webhook-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON