Webhook MCP Server

MCP to Capture HTTP requests, emails, and DNS lookups test webhooks, debugg API callbacks

MCP Servers Python Grade B Listed MIT
70.7/100
Rank #309 of 1328
Compare Webhook MCP Server

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-03 · 10d ago
Recent change
Rank

Is Webhook MCP Server safe? Webhook MCP Server scores 70.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #309 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 11% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#264 → #282)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#183 → #257)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#208 → #183)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
51.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#184

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-13 20:11 UTC · Repo last pushed 10 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-16 2026-09-13

Activity & Reach

Stars
12
Forks
6
Last Push
2026-09-03
10 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
21
Downloads (7d)
109
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼7
was #302

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

70.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Webhook MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
13.4 / 25
3.3 above avg 10.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.2 / 17
in line with avg 12.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.7 / 20
4.6 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.4 / 20
1.6 below avg 7.0

Activity Inputs

51.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
16.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 12, 2026
Signed Commits
11%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Is Webhook MCP Server safe?

Webhook MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Webhook MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Webhook MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Webhook MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Webhook MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Webhook MCP Server actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 10 days ago.
What license does Webhook MCP Server use?
Webhook MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Webhook MCP Server's commits signed?
11% of the last 100 commits to Webhook MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Webhook MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Webhook MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Webhook MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 11HVTrust 2Listed 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Score 1
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#264 → #282)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#183 → #257)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#208 → #183)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 74 spots (#282 → #208)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.8pts (65.8 → 70.6)
2026-09-03
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 9pts (44 → 52)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#247 → #277)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#242 → #255)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 140 spots (#369 → #229)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.1pts (58.1 → 66.2)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#348 → #365)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#363 → #347)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#348 → #363)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#364 → #352)
2026-08-16
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #364

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 70.7 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/webhook-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/webhook-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/webhook-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/webhook-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON