UniFi Gateway
Safety-first MCP server for self-hosted UniFi. 57 Network + 11 Protect + 18 Access tools, dry-run previews, JSONL audit log, composite rollback. Multi-site. Stdio + Streamable HTTP.
Is UniFi Gateway safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare UniFi Gateway
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: UniFi Gateway scores 58.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #683 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.7/10; 79% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How UniFi Gateway compares in MCP Servers
- #376 ChromaDB Remote MCP Server 58.2 +0.1
- #377 Blender MCP 58.2 +0.1
- #378 UniFi Gateway 58.1 this agent
- #379 Apple Books 58.1 ±0
- #380 Cesium MCP 58.1 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks UniFi Gateway’s 58.1.
Where the 58.1 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
58.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceUniFi Gateway MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
57.3 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about UniFi Gateway
Does UniFi Gateway publish package provenance?
Does UniFi Gateway have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is UniFi Gateway actively maintained?
What license does UniFi Gateway use?
Are UniFi Gateway's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to UniFi Gateway's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain UniFi Gateway?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores UniFi Gateway from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/unifi-gateway)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/unifi-gateway"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/unifi-gateway.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON