UK Legal Research
UK legal research MCP server — case law, legislation, Hansard, bills, committees, HMRC, OSCOLA citations.
Is UK Legal Research safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Compare UK Legal Research
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: UK Legal Research scores 75.6/100 (Grade B), ranked #214 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How UK Legal Research compares in MCP Servers
- #122 MCP Server Trello 75.9 +0.3
- #123 Intervals Icu MCP 75.8 +0.2
- #124 UK Legal Research 75.6 this agent
- #125 Metro MCP 75.5 −0.1
- #126 Atlassian Dc MCP 75.5 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks UK Legal Research’s 75.6.
Where the 75.6 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
75.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceUK Legal Research MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
55.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about UK Legal Research
Does UK Legal Research publish package provenance?
Does UK Legal Research have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is UK Legal Research actively maintained?
What license does UK Legal Research use?
Are UK Legal Research's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to UK Legal Research's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain UK Legal Research?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores UK Legal Research from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/uk-legal-research)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/uk-legal-research"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/uk-legal-research.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON