UI5 MCP Server
The UI5 MCP server improves the developer experience when working with agentic AI and the UI5 framework.
Is UI5 MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Compare UI5 MCP Server
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: UI5 MCP Server scores 86.2/100 (Grade A), ranked #64 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 8.5/10; 10% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How UI5 MCP Server compares in MCP Servers
- #18 KiCad MCP Pro 86.5 +0.3
- #19 Microsoft 365 MCP Server 86.5 +0.3
- #20 UI5 MCP Server 86.2 this agent
- #21 Token Optimizer MCP 86.0 −0.2
- #22 Openzim MCP 85.8 −0.4
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks UI5 MCP Server’s 86.2.
Where the 86.2 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
86.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceUI5 MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
59.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about UI5 MCP Server
Does UI5 MCP Server publish package provenance?
Does UI5 MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is UI5 MCP Server actively maintained?
What license does UI5 MCP Server use?
Are UI5 MCP Server's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- shell
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to UI5 MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain UI5 MCP Server?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores UI5 MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ui5-mcp-server)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ui5-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ui5-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON