Is Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP safe to use?

Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP has an HVTrust score of 33.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #726 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP?

Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP scores 33.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 403 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP

tugcantopaloglu/godot-mcp

MCP server for full Godot 4.x engine control: 157 tools for AI-driven game development (GDScript and C#/.NET). Tested wi

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade D Listed MIT

33.0/100

Rank #726 of 1283

Compare Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-13 · 30d ago

Recent change

Rank +2

Is Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP safe? Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP scores 33.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #726 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 21% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#323 Outlook MCP — 33.2 (D) → #324 Lumino MCP Server — 33.0 (D) → #326 MCP Omnisearch — 32.8 (D) → #327 SeedanceMCP — 32.8 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#687 → #727)

2026-08-09

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 8pts (59 → 51)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #669

Maintainer Checklist

Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

51.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#325

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

403

Forks

Last Push

2026-07-13

30 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #727

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

33.0 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

1.1 / 25

3.9 below avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.5 below avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

8.5 / 17

in line with avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

11.9 / 20

0.5 below avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.7 / 20

2.9 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

51.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

15.6 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

20.8 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

6.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

8.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

—

Not available

Signed Commits

21%

of last 100 commits verified

Is Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.

Is Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 30 days ago.

What license does Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP use?

Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP's commits signed?

21% of the last 100 commits to Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

1 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

filesystem

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#687 → #727)

2026-08-09

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 8pts (59 → 51)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #669

GitHub → npm: @tugcantopaloglu/godot-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/tugcantopaloglu-godot-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/tugcantopaloglu-godot-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/tugcantopaloglu-godot-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/tugcantopaloglu-godot-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON