updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

Tradingview MCP

Repository Website

MCP server for market analysis in AI assistants: screeners, multi-timeframe technical analysis, backtests and sentiment for crypto, stocks, forex and futures. 39 tools. Self-host free, or use the hosted version, TradingMCP.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Tradingview MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 58%
Last push 3d ago
Compare Tradingview MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Tradingview MCP scores 57.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #765 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 58% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Tradingview MCP could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Tradingview MCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/atilaahmettaner/tradingview-mcp, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-07. 58% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.3/10 (scanned Nov 1, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review1
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 1
    Contributors 6
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Tradingview MCP is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-03 OSSF Scorecard: 4.3/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Tradingview MCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Tradingview MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #414 Crabeye MCP Bridge 57.9 +0.1
  2. #415 MCPfinder - MCP Server Discovery 57.9 +0.1
  3. #416 Tradingview MCP 57.8 this agent
  4. #417 Map Traveler MCP 57.8 ±0
  5. #418 MCP Shodan 57.5 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Tradingview MCP’s 57.8.

Where the 57.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

57.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Tradingview MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.3 / 25
2.5 below avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.9 below avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.2 / 17
in line with avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.9 / 20
4.7 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.9 / 20
1.3 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 24 spots (#780 → #756)
2026-11-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#761 → #776)
2026-11-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#747 → #761)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
76.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#416
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
5.3k
Forks
1.0k
Last Push
2026-11-07
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
18
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
5
Rank Change
▼3
was #762

Analysis

Activity Inputs

76.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
15.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.0 / 20

Common questions about Tradingview MCP

Tradingview MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Tradingview MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Tradingview MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Tradingview MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Tradingview MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Tradingview MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does Tradingview MCP use?
Tradingview MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Tradingview MCP's commits signed?
57% of the last 100 commits to Tradingview MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Tradingview MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Tradingview MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Tradingview MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Tradingview MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 31HVTrust 4Score 3Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-11-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 24 spots (#780 → #756)
2026-11-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#761 → #776)
2026-11-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#747 → #761)
2026-10-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#746 → #758)
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#760 → #749)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 80 spots (#833 → #753)
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#778 → #818)
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 160 spots (#938 → #778)
2026-10-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.1pts (50.6 → 55.7)
2026-10-04
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 13pts (57 → 70)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 97 spots (#835 → #932)
2026-10-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.2pts (53.9 → 50.7)
2026-10-01
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 10pts (67 → 57)
2026-09-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#802 → #818)
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#783 → #802)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#745 → #783)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 296 spots (#442 → #738)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.8pts (44.5 → 56.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #442
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#664 → #677)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#619 → #664)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#608 → #619)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 80 spots (#528 → #608)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#502 → #528)
2026-09-03
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.3/10
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 710 spots (#1212 → #502)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 33.1pts (24.8 → 57.9)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#1179 → #1212)
2026-09-01
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (72 → 78)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1147 → #1177)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#1109 → #1147)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#1069 → #1109)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 80 spots (#989 → #1069)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#965 → #989)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 103 spots (#862 → #965)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#885 → #860)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#870 → #882)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#882 → #870)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#854 → #882)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#841 → #851)
GitHub → Website →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 57.8 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/tradingview-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/tradingview-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/tradingview-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/tradingview-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON