Is Tradingview MCP safe to use?

Tradingview MCP has an HVTrust score of 57.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #510 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Tradingview MCP?

Tradingview MCP scores 57.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 4.4k GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Tradingview MCP

atilaahmettaner/tradingview-mcp

TradingView MCP server — real-time market data, technical analysis, screeners & backtesting for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor

MCP Servers Python Grade C Listed MIT

57.8/100

Rank #510 of 1320

Compare Tradingview MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-01 · 3d ago

Recent change

Scorecard +9

Is Tradingview MCP safe? Tradingview MCP scores 57.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #510 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 55% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-01. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#231 Plateau Creative MCP — 57.9 (C) → #232 Token Optimizer MCP — 57.9 (C) → #234 MCP For Stata — 57.7 (C) → #235 FAOSTAT MCP — 57.7 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.3/10

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 710 spots (#1212 → #502)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Tradingview MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

77.5

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#233

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

4.4k

Forks

922

Last Push

2026-09-01

3 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼8

was #502

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

57.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Tradingview MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

8.1 / 25

1.4 below avg 9.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.2 / 17

in line with avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.3 / 20

5.1 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.7 / 20

2.5 above avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

77.5 / 100

StarsRepository reach

21.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

17.2 / 25

CommunityFork signal

13.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 4, 2026

Signed Commits

55%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 1

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Tradingview MCP safe?

Tradingview MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Tradingview MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Tradingview MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Tradingview MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Tradingview MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Tradingview MCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).

What license does Tradingview MCP use?

Tradingview MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Tradingview MCP's commits signed?

55% of the last 100 commits to Tradingview MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Tradingview MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Tradingview MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Tradingview MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.3/10

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 710 spots (#1212 → #502)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 33.1pts (24.8 → 57.9)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#1179 → #1212)

2026-09-01

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 7pts (72 → 78)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#1147 → #1177)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#1109 → #1147)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#1069 → #1109)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 80 spots (#989 → #1069)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#965 → #989)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 103 spots (#862 → #965)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank rose 25 spots (#885 → #860)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#870 → #882)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#882 → #870)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#854 → #882)

2026-08-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#841 → #851)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#819 → #834)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 45 spots (#772 → #817)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #787

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/tradingview-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/tradingview-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/tradingview-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/tradingview-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON