updated 2026-10-18 00:07 UTC

tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server

Repository Website

TouchDesigner MCP server, describe a visual to Claude, Cursor or Codex and it builds a real, playable node network (audio-reactive, generative, particle, 3D, feedback) with live knobs + MIDI/OSC/DMX, then checks for errors and previews its own work.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 91%
Last push 64d ago
Advisories None known
Compare tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server scores 52.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #948 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.2/10; 91% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@dpantani/tdmcp); last pushed 2026-08-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/Pantani/tdmcp, MIT, last pushed 2026-08-15. 91% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.2/10 (scanned Oct 17, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review7
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies9
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 9
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 7
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 7
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 9
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    • npm @dpantani/tdmcp Source link points back to this repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: @dpantani/tdmcp 0.13.2. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-18).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-28 OSSF Scorecard: 5.2/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #527 Funplay Godot MCP 52.3 +0.2
  2. #528 Brainstorm MCP 52.2 +0.1
  3. #529 tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server 52.1 this agent
  4. #530 Bitrise 52.1 ±0
  5. #531 MCP Server Zotero Dev 52.1 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server’s 52.1.

Where the 52.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

52.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
9.8 / 25
0.8 below avg 10.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.8 below avg 13.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.1 / 17
in line with avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
7.7 / 20
4.5 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.0 / 20
in line with avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#926 → #938)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#893 → #917)
2026-10-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#911 → #893)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 64 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server View MCP Servers Report missing data
31.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#529
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-18 00:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 64 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-17

Activity & Reach

Stars
51
Forks
9
Last Push
2026-08-15
64 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
137
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼3
was #945

Analysis

Activity Inputs

31.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
16.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.7 / 20

Common questions about tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server

Public trust evidence for tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 64 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server use?
tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server's commits signed?
91% of the last 100 commits to tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores tdmcp — TouchDesigner MCP server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 29HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Score 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#926 → #938)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#893 → #917)
2026-10-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#911 → #893)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#887 → #911)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#859 → #875)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 276 spots (#1090 → #814)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 31.7pts (22.4 → 54.1)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1090
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#792 → #803)
2026-09-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#755 → #776)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#700 → #747)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 76 spots (#624 → #700)
2026-09-10
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 7pts (46 → 39)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#579 → #617)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#528 → #579)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#507 → #528)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#461 → #507)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#447 → #461)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 570 spots (#1017 → #447)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 21.9pts (38.1 → 60.0)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#968 → #1017)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#930 → #968)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#901 → #930)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#860 → #901)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#814 → #860)
2026-08-28
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.2/10
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 316 spots (#1130 → #814)
2026-08-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 17.7pts (20.5 → 38.2)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#1111 → #1130)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 66 spots (#1045 → #1111)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#1050 → #1037)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#1018 → #1050)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1009 → #1019)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#1026 → #1009)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 60 spots (#986 → #1046)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #971
GitHub → Website → npm: @dpantani/tdmcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 52.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/tdmcp-touchdesigner-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/tdmcp-touchdesigner-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/tdmcp-touchdesigner-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/tdmcp-touchdesigner-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON