Is TalkToFigma MCP safe to use?

TalkToFigma MCP has an HVTrust score of 43.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #954 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for TalkToFigma MCP?

TalkToFigma MCP scores 43.7/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 7.0k GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

TalkToFigma MCP

grab/cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp

TalkToFigma: MCP integration between AI Agent (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex) and Figma, allowing Agentic AI to communicate

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade D Listed MIT

43.7/100

Rank #954 of 1320

Compare TalkToFigma MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-26 · 40d ago

Recent change

Rank +9

Is TalkToFigma MCP safe? TalkToFigma MCP scores 43.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #954 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 1.6/10; 16% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#521 Chart Library — Pattern Intelligence — 43.7 (D) → #522 Crabeye MCP Bridge — 43.7 (D) → #524 Glidermcp Com — 43.6 (D) → #525 Balldontlie Api MCP — 43.6 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#936 → #954)

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 1.6/10

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 323 spots (#1259 → #936)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 1.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 40 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for TalkToFigma MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

55.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#523

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

7.0k

Forks

772

Last Push

2026-07-26

40 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼18

was #936

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

43.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

TalkToFigma MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

2.8 / 25

6.7 below avg 9.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

9.9 / 17

1.9 below avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

9.3 / 20

2.9 below avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

9.2 / 20

3.0 above avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

55.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

23.1 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

19.4 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

13.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

1.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026

Signed Commits

16%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 0

Is TalkToFigma MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for TalkToFigma MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does TalkToFigma MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for TalkToFigma MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does TalkToFigma MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

TalkToFigma MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 1.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is TalkToFigma MCP actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 40 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does TalkToFigma MCP use?

TalkToFigma MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are TalkToFigma MCP's commits signed?

16% of the last 100 commits to TalkToFigma MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

TalkToFigma MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain TalkToFigma MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores TalkToFigma MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#936 → #954)

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 1.6/10

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 323 spots (#1259 → #936)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 22.7pts (21.1 → 43.8)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#1233 → #1259)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#1210 → #1233)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#1186 → #1210)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#1160 → #1186)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#1130 → #1160)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#1105 → #1130)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#1089 → #1105)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 67 spots (#1022 → #1089)

2026-08-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#980 → #1022)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#967 → #980)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#979 → #967)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#951 → #977)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#939 → #952)

2026-08-10

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #940

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/talktofigma-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/talktofigma-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/talktofigma-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/talktofigma-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON