updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

Sub Agents MCP

shinpr/sub-agents-mcp

Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Sub Agents MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 65%
Last push 16d ago
Compare Sub Agents MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Sub Agents MCP scores 62.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #550 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.7/10; 65% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Sub Agents MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #309 MCP Console Automation 62.8 +0.2
  2. #310 MCP Server for Excel 62.6 ±0
  3. #311 Sub Agents MCP 62.6 this agent
  4. #312 Red Hat Lightspeed MCP 62.5 −0.1
  5. #313 Arr MCP 62.4 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Sub Agents MCP’s 62.6.

Where the 62.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

62.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Sub Agents MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.4 / 25
in line with avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.3 / 17
1.1 above avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
15.4 / 20
3.3 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.7 / 20
in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 239 spots (#782 → #543)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Sub Agents MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
54.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#311
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 16 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
98
Forks
16
Last Push
2026-09-10
16 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
12
Downloads (7d)
143
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▲7
was #557

Analysis

Activity Inputs

54.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
12.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
13.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 23, 2026
Signed Commits
65%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 10
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Sub Agents MCP

Sub Agents MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Sub Agents MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Sub Agents MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Sub Agents MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Sub Agents MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Sub Agents MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 16 days ago.
What license does Sub Agents MCP use?
Sub Agents MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Sub Agents MCP's commits signed?
65% of the last 100 commits to Sub Agents MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Sub Agents MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Sub Agents MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, Google Gemini

Maintain Sub Agents MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Sub Agents MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 25HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Surface 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 239 spots (#782 → #543)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 33.6pts (29.2 → 62.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #782
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#480 → #508)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#460 → #470)
2026-09-09
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 629 spots (#1087 → #458)
2026-09-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 22.0pts (42.4 → 64.4)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#1048 → #1080)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1036 → #1048)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#997 → #1036)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#973 → #997)
2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, Google Gemini
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 56 spots (#917 → #973)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 55 spots (#862 → #917)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#839 → #862)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#808 → #839)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#789 → #808)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#742 → #789)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#710 → #742)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#688 → #710)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.7/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 265 spots (#953 → #688)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 19.9pts (22.5 → 42.4)
2026-08-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#968 → #946)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#980 → #968)
2026-08-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#976 → #986)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#980 → #967)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#946 → #980)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#935 → #947)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#946 → #935)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#884 → #936)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #875
GitHub → npm: sub-agents-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.6 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/sub-agents-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/sub-agents-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/sub-agents-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/sub-agents-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON