Is Stealth Browser MCP safe to use?

Stealth Browser MCP has an HVTrust score of 50.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #886 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Stealth Browser MCP?

Stealth Browser MCP scores 50.5/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.9k GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Stealth Browser MCP

vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp

The only browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems. AI writes network hooks, clones UIs pixel-perfect via simple

MCP Servers Python Grade C Listed MIT

50.5/100

Rank #886 of 1328

Compare Stealth Browser MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-07 · 1d ago

Recent change

Rank +10

Is Stealth Browser MCP safe? Stealth Browser MCP scores 50.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #886 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.7/10; 15% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#497 MeiGen AI Design MCP — 50.7 (C) → #498 Serpapi MCP — 50.6 (C) → #500 Meta Ads MCP — 50.5 (C) → #501 Chart Library — Pattern Intelligence — 50.4 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#874 → #886)

2026-09-07

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#857 → #874)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Stealth Browser MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

67.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#499

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.9k

Forks

274

Last Push

2026-09-07

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼12

was #874

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

50.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Stealth Browser MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

5.4 / 25

4.5 below avg 9.9

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.6 / 17

in line with avg 12.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.8 / 20

1.6 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.9 / 20

1.0 above avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

67.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

19.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

11.9 / 25

CommunityFork signal

11.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.7 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 8, 2026

Signed Commits

15%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 2

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Stealth Browser MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Stealth Browser MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Stealth Browser MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Stealth Browser MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Stealth Browser MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Stealth Browser MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Stealth Browser MCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Stealth Browser MCP use?

Stealth Browser MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Stealth Browser MCP's commits signed?

15% of the last 100 commits to Stealth Browser MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Stealth Browser MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Stealth Browser MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain Stealth Browser MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Stealth Browser MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#874 → #886)

2026-09-07

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#857 → #874)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#842 → #857)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 62 spots (#780 → #842)

2026-09-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#750 → #780)

2026-09-03

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 100 spots (#650 → #750)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#636 → #650)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#614 → #636)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#580 → #614)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#560 → #574)

2026-08-28

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 60 spots (#620 → #560)

2026-08-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.2pts (46.1 → 50.3)

2026-08-28

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 11pts (51 → 62)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#608 → #620)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 433 spots (#1041 → #608)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 25.5pts (20.6 → 46.1)

2026-08-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 52 spots (#981 → #1033)

2026-08-23

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 8pts (59 → 51)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#991 → #981)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#988 → #976)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#960 → #988)

2026-08-10

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #952

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/stealth-browser-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/stealth-browser-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/stealth-browser-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/stealth-browser-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON