Is spencermarx · Open Code Review safe to use?

spencermarx · Open Code Review has an HVTrust score of 40.5/100 (Grade D), ranked #330 of 371 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for spencermarx · Open Code Review?

spencermarx · Open Code Review scores 40.5/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 371 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

spencermarx · Open Code Review

Repository

AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a customizable team of Engineers performing code review with built-in discourse.

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is spencermarx · Open Code Review safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 14%

Last push 75d ago

Compare spencermarx · Open Code Review

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: spencermarx · Open Code Review scores 40.5/100 (Grade D), ranked #330 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 14% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-28. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How spencermarx · Open Code Review could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 3.6 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0, Dependency-Update-Tool 0 +11.3 → 51.8 C · #215 of 371
Sign every commit14% signed today +4.3 → 44.8 D · #295 of 371

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships spencermarx · Open Code Review and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

Source Partly signed

github.com/spencermarx/open-code-review, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-07-28. 14% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
Review and release Weak

OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.6/10 (scanned Oct 6, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection3
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0
Published packages None

No registry package. spencermarx · Open Code Review is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

2026-09-02 OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

GitHub repository data
Package downloads (missing)
Supply-chain checks
Public actions (missing)
Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues spencermarx · Open Code Review’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How spencermarx · Open Code Review compares in Agent Skills

#328 Tinte 40.7 +0.2
#329 Agentic SEO Skill 40.5 ±0
#330 spencermarx · Open Code Review 40.5 this agent
#331 Everything Claude Code Zh 39.9 −0.6
#332 Deep Project 39.7 −0.8

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks spencermarx · Open Code Review’s 40.5.

Where the 40.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

40.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

spencermarx · Open Code Review Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

5.2 / 25

2.6 below avg 7.8

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.6 / 17

in line with avg 12.1

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

7.0 / 20

7.1 below avg 14.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.2 / 20

2.8 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#289 → #313)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 75 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for spencermarx · Open Code Review View Agent Skills Report missing data

37.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#330

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars

371

Forks

Last Push

2026-07-28

75 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼3

was #327

Analysis

Activity Inputs

37.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

15.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

14.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

7.3 / 20

Common questions about spencermarx · Open Code Review

Public trust evidence for spencermarx · Open Code Review is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does spencermarx · Open Code Review publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for spencermarx · Open Code Review. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does spencermarx · Open Code Review have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

spencermarx · Open Code Review has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is spencermarx · Open Code Review actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 75 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does spencermarx · Open Code Review use?

spencermarx · Open Code Review ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are spencermarx · Open Code Review's commits signed?

14% of the last 100 commits to spencermarx · Open Code Review are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to spencermarx · Open Code Review's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintain spencermarx · Open Code Review?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores spencermarx · Open Code Review from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#289 → #313)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 61 spots (#227 → #288)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.8pts (32.9 → 41.7)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #227

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#264 → #275)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#218 → #228)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#203 → #213)

2026-09-02

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 109 spots (#312 → #203)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 25.4pts (17.6 → 43.0)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#241 → #281)

2026-08-27

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 14pts (57 → 43)

2026-08-26

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #241

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/spencermarx-open-code-review.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/spencermarx-open-code-review)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/spencermarx-open-code-review"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/spencermarx-open-code-review.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON

spencermarx · Open Code Review

How spencermarx · Open Code Review could raise its score

Chain of custody

Source Partly signed

Review and release Weak

Published packages None

Changes to this chain

Evidence behind this score

Verify this score yourself

What this score doesn’t check

How spencermarx · Open Code Review compares in Agent Skills

Where the 40.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

Quick Trust Read

Rank Trend

Activity & Reach

Analysis

Activity Inputs

Common questions about spencermarx · Open Code Review

AI agent surface

Maintain spencermarx · Open Code Review?

Reputation Timeline

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

Other agents in Agent Skills