Is Shuorenhua safe to use?

Shuorenhua has an HVTrust score of 51.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #218 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Shuorenhua?

Shuorenhua scores 51.5/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.9k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Shuorenhua

MrGeDiao/shuorenhua

说人话｜中文优先的去 AI 味改写 skill：保事实、分场景、改完可直接发。Chinese-first rewrite skill for Codex / Claude Code / Cursor / ChatGPT — removes AI tone, preserves facts.

Agent Skills Python Listed MIT

Is Shuorenhua safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 3%

Last push today

Compare Shuorenhua

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Shuorenhua scores 51.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #218 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 3% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Shuorenhua compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Shuorenhua’s 51.5.

Where the 51.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

51.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Shuorenhua Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

4.7 / 25

3.4 below avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.6 / 17

0.6 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

16.8 / 20

2.6 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.9 / 20

1.1 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#201 → #221)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Shuorenhua View Agent Skills Report missing data

68.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#218

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.9k

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-26

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲3

was #221

Analysis

Activity Inputs

68.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

19.6 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

15.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

8.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests -1

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Shuorenhua

Public trust evidence for Shuorenhua is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Shuorenhua publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Shuorenhua. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Shuorenhua have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Shuorenhua has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Shuorenhua actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Shuorenhua use?

Shuorenhua ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Shuorenhua's commits signed?

3% of the last 100 commits to Shuorenhua are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

medium confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Shuorenhua's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintain Shuorenhua?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Shuorenhua from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#201 → #221)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 89 spots (#112 → #201)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.4pts (43.0 → 51.4)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #112

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#146 → #164)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#122 → #132)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#108 → #122)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#91 → #108)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#71 → #91)

2026-08-28

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-08-28

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 146 spots (#217 → #71)

2026-08-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 30.0pts (21.5 → 51.5)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#207 → #217)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 94 spots (#113 → #207)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#102 → #112)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #99

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/shuorenhua.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/shuorenhua)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/shuorenhua"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/shuorenhua.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON