Is Sentry MCP safe to use?

Sentry MCP has an HVTrust score of 71.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #125 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Sentry MCP?

Sentry MCP scores 71.5/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 809 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Sentry MCP

getsentry/sentry-mcp

An MCP server for interacting with Sentry via LLMs.

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade B Listed NOASSERTION Source-available

71.5/100

Rank #125 of 1283

Compare Sentry MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-11 · 0d ago

Recent change

Rank

Is Sentry MCP safe? Sentry MCP scores 71.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #125 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.4/10; 96% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#20 Safari MCP — 71.9 (B) → #21 AWS MCP Servers — 71.7 (B) → #23 Supabase MCP Server — 71.3 (B) → #24 Openzim MCP — 71.2 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#108 → #120)

2026-07-27

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#115 → #105)

2026-07-13

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Sentry MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

74.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#22

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Activity & Reach

Stars

809

Forks

134

Last Push

2026-08-11

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

91,086

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #126

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

71.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Sentry MCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

11.6 / 25

6.6 above avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.5 below avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.1 / 17

4.3 above avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.0 / 20

6.5 above avg 12.5

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

13.6 / 20

7.8 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

74.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

21.9 / 25

CommunityFork signal

9.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

5.4 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 10, 2026

Signed Commits

96%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 9

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 1

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 9

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 4

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Sentry MCP safe?

Source-available software. A lower HVTrust score reflects fewer public supply-chain artifacts (open license, build provenance, signed commits) — not a security finding. Sentry MCP may have internal security practices not visible through public signals.

Sentry MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Sentry MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Sentry MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Sentry MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Sentry MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Sentry MCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Sentry MCP use?

Sentry MCP ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Sentry MCP's commits signed?

96% of the last 100 commits to Sentry MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Sentry MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

3 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

code

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Sentry MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-07-13

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace

2026-07-13

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI

2026-07-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-07-13

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

Maintain Sentry MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Sentry MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#108 → #120)

2026-07-27

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#115 → #105)

2026-07-13

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → marketplace

2026-07-13

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI

2026-07-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-07-13

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-07-13

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 243 spots (#339 → #96)

2026-07-13

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 61.0pts (9.0 → 70.0)

2026-07-13

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 72pts (0 → 72)

2026-07-12

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #339

GitHub → npm: @sentry/mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/sentry-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/sentry-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/sentry-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/sentry-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON