SeedanceMCP

Seedance by Ace Data Cloud: text-to-video, image-to-video and task results via MCP.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is SeedanceMCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 24%
Last push 3d ago
Advisories None known
Compare SeedanceMCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: SeedanceMCP scores 58.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #743 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 24% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (mcp-seedance); last pushed 2026-11-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How SeedanceMCP could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships SeedanceMCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/AceDataCloud/SeedanceMCP, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-07. 24% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.6/10 (scanned Nov 9, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 9
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests -1
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    • PyPI mcp-seedance Source link points back to this repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: mcp-seedance 2026.11.7.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-09).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues SeedanceMCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How SeedanceMCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #402 Atlassian Rovo MCP Server 58.4 ±0
  2. #403 Mondaycom MCP 58.4 ±0
  3. #404 SeedanceMCP 58.4 this agent
  4. #405 Random Number MCP 58.4 ±0
  5. #406 Orcaslicer MCP 58.4 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks SeedanceMCP’s 58.4.

Where the 58.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

58.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

SeedanceMCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.9 / 25
3.9 below avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.9 below avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.4 / 17
in line with avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.0 / 20
4.8 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.9 / 20
0.7 below avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#752 → #742)
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 30 spots (#782 → #752)
2026-10-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#764 → #783)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
50.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#404

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
21
Forks
1
Last Push
2026-11-07
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
19
Downloads (7d)
614
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼3
was #740

Analysis

Activity Inputs

50.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
16.2 / 25
CommunityFork signal
1.4 / 20

Common questions about SeedanceMCP

SeedanceMCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does SeedanceMCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for SeedanceMCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does SeedanceMCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
SeedanceMCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is SeedanceMCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does SeedanceMCP use?
SeedanceMCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are SeedanceMCP's commits signed?
24% of the last 100 commits to SeedanceMCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
SeedanceMCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to SeedanceMCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-10-19
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-10-09
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain SeedanceMCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores SeedanceMCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 36HVTrust 3Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#752 → #742)
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 30 spots (#782 → #752)
2026-10-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#764 → #783)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#739 → #759)
2026-10-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#716 → #739)
2026-10-19
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-10-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 102 spots (#812 → #710)
2026-10-19
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.2pts (55.9 → 59.1)
2026-10-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#825 → #812)
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#807 → #820)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#795 → #807)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#760 → #795)
2026-10-09
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#739 → #757)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 45 spots (#786 → #741)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#783 → #796)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#793 → #783)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#773 → #793)
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#816 → #826)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 197 spots (#1007 → #810)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.4pts (24.8 → 54.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1007
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#733 → #746)
2026-09-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#696 → #712)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#676 → #690)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#664 → #676)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#650 → #664)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#632 → #647)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#585 → #632)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#574 → #585)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 80 spots (#494 → #574)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#464 → #485)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 45 spots (#509 → #464)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#495 → #509)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#464 → #495)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#475 → #464)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 71 spots (#404 → #475)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#398 → #409)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 322 spots (#720 → #398)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.9pts (34.7 → 58.6)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#745 → #723)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#733 → #743)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 58.4 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/seedancemcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/seedancemcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/seedancemcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/seedancemcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON