SeedanceMCP

MCP server for ByteDance Seedance video generation via Ace Data Cloud.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is SeedanceMCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 35%
Last push 22d ago
Compare SeedanceMCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: SeedanceMCP scores 54.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #819 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 35% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How SeedanceMCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #458 MCP 1c Platform Tools 54.0 ±0
  2. #459 RU Marketplace MCP 54.0 ±0
  3. #460 SeedanceMCP 54.0 this agent
  4. #461 Stealth Browser MCP 54.0 ±0
  5. #462 SharePoint MCP Server 54.0 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks SeedanceMCP’s 54.0.

Where the 54.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

54.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

SeedanceMCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.4 / 25
2.9 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.3 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.9 / 20
0.8 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.6 / 20
1.6 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 197 spots (#1007 → #810)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
38.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#460

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 22 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
19
Forks
1
Last Push
2026-09-04
22 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
3
Downloads (7d)
68
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼3
was #816

Analysis

Activity Inputs

38.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
21.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
7.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
1.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026
Signed Commits
35%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 9
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about SeedanceMCP

Public trust evidence for SeedanceMCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does SeedanceMCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for SeedanceMCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does SeedanceMCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
SeedanceMCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is SeedanceMCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 22 days ago.
What license does SeedanceMCP use?
SeedanceMCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are SeedanceMCP's commits signed?
35% of the last 100 commits to SeedanceMCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
SeedanceMCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to SeedanceMCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

Maintain SeedanceMCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores SeedanceMCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 21Listed 2HVTrust 2Grade 2Surface 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 197 spots (#1007 → #810)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.4pts (24.8 → 54.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1007
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#733 → #746)
2026-09-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#696 → #712)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#676 → #690)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#664 → #676)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#650 → #664)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#632 → #647)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#585 → #632)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#574 → #585)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 80 spots (#494 → #574)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#464 → #485)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 45 spots (#509 → #464)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#495 → #509)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#464 → #495)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#475 → #464)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 71 spots (#404 → #475)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#398 → #409)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 322 spots (#720 → #398)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.9pts (34.7 → 58.6)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#745 → #723)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#733 → #743)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#703 → #741)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #703

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 54.0 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/seedancemcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/seedancemcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/seedancemcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/seedancemcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON