updated 2026-10-11 00:07 UTC

scientific-illustrator

Repository

Editable scientific figures in PowerPoint and draw.io via Codex/MCP with Designer-Drawer-Reviewer-Corrector quality gates.

MCP Servers JavaScript Listed MIT

Is scientific-illustrator safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 42%
Last push 33d ago
Compare scientific-illustrator

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: scientific-illustrator scores 46.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #1059 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.1/10; 42% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How scientific-illustrator could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships scientific-illustrator and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/icebird1998/scientific-illustrator, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-08. 42% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.1/10 (scanned Oct 3, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions10
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 10
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. scientific-illustrator is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-04 OSSF Scorecard: 4.1/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues scientific-illustrator’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How scientific-illustrator compares in MCP Servers

  1. #610 MCP Obsidian 46.8 +0.2
  2. #611 TradeOS 46.7 +0.1
  3. #612 scientific-illustrator 46.6 this agent
  4. #613 Simplenote MCP 46.6 ±0
  5. #614 Multi-MCP 46.4 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks scientific-illustrator’s 46.6.

Where the 46.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

46.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

scientific-illustrator MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.2 / 25
3.2 below avg 10.4
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.7 below avg 13.5
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.0 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.8 / 20
2.4 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.1 / 20
in line with avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1043 → #1053)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1008 → #1019)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 33 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for scientific-illustrator View MCP Servers Report missing data
47.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#612
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-11 00:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 33 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
917
Forks
69
Last Push
2026-09-08
33 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
2
Rank Change
▼3
was #1056

Analysis

Activity Inputs

47.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
17.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
20.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.6 / 20

Common questions about scientific-illustrator

Public trust evidence for scientific-illustrator is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does scientific-illustrator publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for scientific-illustrator. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does scientific-illustrator have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
scientific-illustrator has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is scientific-illustrator actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 33 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does scientific-illustrator use?
scientific-illustrator ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are scientific-illustrator's commits signed?
42% of the last 100 commits to scientific-illustrator are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to scientific-illustrator's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

Maintain scientific-illustrator?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores scientific-illustrator from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 19Listed 2Score 2HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Surface 1
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1043 → #1053)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1008 → #1019)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 453 spots (#542 → #995)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.3pts (37.5 → 47.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #542
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#961 → #971)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#949 → #961)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#939 → #952)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 37 spots (#976 → #939)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 86 spots (#890 → #976)
2026-09-07
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (53 → 46)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#876 → #890)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#818 → #876)
2026-09-04
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.1/10
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 467 spots (#1285 → #818)
2026-09-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.8pts (19.9 → 48.7)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1271 → #1285)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#1248 → #1271)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1230 → #1248)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#1190 → #1230)
2026-08-31
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (59 → 53)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#1151 → #1190)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1121 → #1151)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#1092 → #1121)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1074 → #1092)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1074
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 46.6 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/scientific-illustrator.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/scientific-illustrator)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/scientific-illustrator"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/scientific-illustrator.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON