Pyod

A Python library for anomaly detection across tabular, time series, graph, text, image, and audio data. 60+ detectors, b

Agent Frameworks Python Grade B Listed BSD-2-Clause
72.3/100
Rank #109 of 1204
Compare Pyod

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-02 · 7d ago
Recent change
Rank

Is Pyod safe? Pyod scores 72.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #109 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 27% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#98 → #108)
2026-08-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#103 → #93)
2026-07-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#118 → #106)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
78.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#19

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-09 19:01 UTC · Repo last pushed 7 days ago

Activity & Reach

Stars
10.0k
Forks
1.5k
Last Push
2026-08-02
7 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
17
Downloads (7d)
966,473
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
187
Rank Change
▼1
was #108

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

72.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Pyod Agent Frameworks average (117 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.2 / 25
in line with avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.2 / 17
1.6 above avg 11.6
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.5 / 20
2.2 above avg 14.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
17.6 / 20
6.2 above avg 11.4

Activity Inputs

78.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
15.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 9, 2026
Signed Commits
27%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 7
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 9
Security-Policy 4
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 2

Is Pyod safe?

Pyod has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Pyod publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Pyod. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Pyod have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Pyod has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Pyod actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 7 day(s).
What license does Pyod use?
Pyod ships under BSD-2-Clause. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Pyod's commits signed?
27% of the last 100 commits to Pyod are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Pyod appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Pyod's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-06-01
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain Pyod?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Pyod from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 14Grade 11Score 7HVTrust 6Listed 1Fresh 1Scorecard 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#98 → #108)
2026-08-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#103 → #93)
2026-07-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#118 → #106)
2026-07-20
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-07-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 47 spots (#157 → #110)
2026-07-20
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.9pts (64.7 → 69.6)
2026-07-20
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 13pts (59 → 72)
2026-07-17
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-07-17
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#129 → #154)
2026-07-17
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 8pts (67 → 60)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#106 → #117)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#92 → #106)
2026-07-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-06-21
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-06-20
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-06-18
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-06-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#124 → #111)
2026-06-17
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 5pts (72 → 78)
2026-06-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#125 → #115)
2026-06-10
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-06-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#90 → #121)
2026-06-10
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 4.6pts (66.5 → 61.9)
2026-06-10
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 8pts (82 → 75)
2026-06-08
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-06-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 24 spots (#114 → #90)
2026-06-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.0pts (62.6 → 66.6)
2026-06-08
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (75 → 82)
2026-06-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-06-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#89 → #114)
2026-06-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 4.1pts (66.7 → 62.6)
2026-06-07
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 7pts (82 → 75)
2026-06-06
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-06-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 89 spots (#178 → #89)
2026-06-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.4pts (39.3 → 66.7)
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-06-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.9/10
2026-06-01
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-06-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 73 spots (#186 → #113)
2026-06-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 57.8pts (0.0 → 57.8)
2026-06-01
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 82pts (0 → 82)
2026-05-31
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #186

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 72.3 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pyod.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pyod)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pyod"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pyod.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON