PPT Design Skill
Precision PPT design skill for OpenCode/Claude Code/Codex, with 40,000+ styles, pixel-perfect Build Mode control, AI image generation, and fully editable PPTX. 面向专业演示设计场景，帮助用户从需求分析、视觉方向选择到原生可编辑 PPTX 交付，打造高质量、可持续修改的演示文稿。
Is PPT Design Skill safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare PPT Design Skill
How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: PPT Design Skill scores 42.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #334 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-09-16. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How PPT Design Skill could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 3.9 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +10.6 → 53.4 C · #207 of 384
- Sign every commit0% signed today +5.0 → 47.8 D · #287 of 384
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships PPT Design Skill and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.
-
Source Unsigned
github.com/sunchaokun/PPT-Design-Skill, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-16. None of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so no change traces to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Weak
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.9/10 (scanned Oct 18, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 0CI-Tests -1CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 0Contributors 0Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 10Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies 0SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 10 -
Published packages None
No registry package. PPT Design Skill is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-09-09 OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues PPT Design Skill’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.
How PPT Design Skill compares in Agent Skills
- #332 Skills Vote 43.0 +0.2
- #333 NanoResearch 42.9 +0.1
- #334 PPT Design Skill 42.8 this agent
- #335 Auteur 42.8 ±0
- #336 Claude Code Settings 42.6 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks PPT Design Skill’s 42.8.
Where the 42.8 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average
42.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidencePPT Design Skill Agent Skills average (384 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
41.0 / 100Common questions about PPT Design Skill
Does PPT Design Skill publish package provenance?
Does PPT Design Skill have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is PPT Design Skill actively maintained?
What license does PPT Design Skill use?
Are PPT Design Skill's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain PPT Design Skill?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores PPT Design Skill from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ppt-design-skill)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ppt-design-skill"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ppt-design-skill.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Skills
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON