Pcb MCP

A PCB mcp server and client for AI Tools.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Pcb MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 6%
Last push 252d ago

In detail: Pcb MCP scores 35.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #1237 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.3/10; 6% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-01-17. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Pcb MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #736 SignNow Api Helper MCP 35.4 +0.1
  2. #737 Agent MCP Gateway 35.4 +0.1
  3. #738 Pcb MCP 35.3 this agent
  4. #739 Obsidian Vault MCP Server 35.2 −0.1
  5. #740 MCP Language Server 35.1 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Pcb MCP’s 35.3.

Where the 35.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

35.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Pcb MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.2 / 25
7.1 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.5 / 17
1.7 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
12.1 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
4.8 / 20
2.4 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 75 spots (#1311 → #1236)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.2pts (12.1 → 35.3)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 252 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
7.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#738

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 10:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 252 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
10
Forks
1
Last Push
2026-01-17
252 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
54
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
=
was #1237

Analysis

Activity Inputs

7.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
1.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 19, 2026
Signed Commits
6%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 8
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Pcb MCP

Public trust evidence for Pcb MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Pcb MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Pcb MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Pcb MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Pcb MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Pcb MCP actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 252 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does Pcb MCP use?
Pcb MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Pcb MCP's commits signed?
5% of the last 100 commits to Pcb MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Pcb MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Pcb MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain Pcb MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Pcb MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20Listed 2HVTrust 2Surface 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 75 spots (#1311 → #1236)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.2pts (12.1 → 35.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1311
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1207 → #1218)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1191 → #1207)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1175 → #1191)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1144 → #1175)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1130 → #1144)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#1083 → #1130)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#1041 → #1083)
2026-09-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.3/10
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 154 spots (#1195 → #1041)
2026-09-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.9pts (22.1 → 35.0)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1164 → #1195)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#1128 → #1164)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#1093 → #1128)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1063 → #1093)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#1042 → #1063)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 83 spots (#959 → #1042)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#950 → #962)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#972 → #952)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#941 → #972)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 30 spots (#962 → #932)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 64 spots (#896 → #960)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1168

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 35.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pcb-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pcb-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pcb-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pcb-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON