Is Optim Agent safe to use?

Optim Agent has an HVTrust score of 51.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #223 of 371 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Optim Agent?

Optim Agent scores 51.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 798 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Optim Agent

Repository Website

LLM agents as your hyperparameter optimizer.

Agent Skills Python Listed MIT

Is Optim Agent safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 4%

Last push 62d ago

Advisories None known

Compare Optim Agent

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Optim Agent scores 51.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #223 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.2/10; 4% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (optim-agent); last pushed 2026-08-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Optim Agent could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Publish build provenance for its packagesPyPI Trusted Publishing attestations +14.7 → 66.5 B · #46 of 371
Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 6.2 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +5.8 → 57.6 C · #132 of 371
Sign every commit4% signed today +4.9 → 56.7 C · #142 of 371

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Optim Agent and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

Source Partly signed

github.com/Optim-Agent/optim-agent, MIT, last pushed 2026-08-14. 4% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
Review and release Mixed

OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 6.2/10 (scanned Oct 14, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releases0
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions10
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 10
Published packages Linked, not attested
- PyPI optim-agent Source link points back to this repo No build attestation
Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.
What you install today No known advisories

Latest release checked: optim-agent 0.1.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-14).

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of Optim Agent.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

GitHub repository data
Package downloads
Supply-chain checks
Public actions (missing)
Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Optim Agent’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Optim Agent compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Optim Agent’s 51.8.

Where the 51.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

51.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Optim Agent Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.9 / 25

in line with avg 8.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.8 / 17

1.7 above avg 12.1

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

7.9 / 20

6.2 below avg 14.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.7 / 20

in line with avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-10-09

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#226 → #213)

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#194 → #213)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 62 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Optim Agent View Agent Skills Report missing data

41.5

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#223

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-15

Activity & Reach

Stars

798

Forks

Last Push

2026-08-14

62 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #222

Analysis

Activity Inputs

41.5 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

16.4 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

7.6 / 20

Common questions about Optim Agent

Public trust evidence for Optim Agent is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Optim Agent publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Optim Agent. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Optim Agent have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Optim Agent has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Optim Agent actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 62 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does Optim Agent use?

Optim Agent ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Optim Agent's commits signed?

3% of the last 100 commits to Optim Agent are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Optim Agent's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintain Optim Agent?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Optim Agent from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-10-09

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#226 → #213)

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#194 → #213)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 108 spots (#304 → #196)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 25.8pts (25.9 → 51.7)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #304

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#163 → #183)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#118 → #142)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#83 → #95)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#67 → #83)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#54 → #67)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#41 → #54)

2026-08-26

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #32

GitHub → Website → PyPI: optim-agent

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/optim-agent.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/optim-agent)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/optim-agent"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/optim-agent.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON

Optim Agent

How Optim Agent could raise its score

Chain of custody

Source Partly signed

Review and release Mixed

Published packages Linked, not attested

What you install today No known advisories

Changes to this chain

Evidence behind this score

Verify this score yourself

What this score doesn’t check

How Optim Agent compares in Agent Skills

Where the 51.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

Quick Trust Read

Rank Trend

Activity & Reach

Analysis

Activity Inputs

Common questions about Optim Agent

AI agent surface

Maintain Optim Agent?

Reputation Timeline

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

Other agents in Agent Skills