OpenEvolve

Open-source implementation of AlphaEvolve

Agent Frameworks Python Grade C Listed Apache-2.0
50.2/100
Rank #464 of 1308
Compare OpenEvolve

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-18 · 32d ago
Recent change
Rank +3

Is OpenEvolve safe? OpenEvolve scores 50.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #464 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; 41% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-18. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#450 → #464)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#423 → #440)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 32 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
58.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#66

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-19 05:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 32 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-19

Activity & Reach

Stars
7.2k
Forks
1.1k
Last Push
2026-07-18
32 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
73
Rank Change
▼14
was #450

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

50.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

OpenEvolve Agent Frameworks average (119 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.7 / 25
0.6 above avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
1.5 above avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.9 / 20
4.5 below avg 14.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.3 / 20
2.0 below avg 11.3

Activity Inputs

58.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
20.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 18, 2026
Signed Commits
41%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 7
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 9

Is OpenEvolve safe?

Public trust evidence for OpenEvolve is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does OpenEvolve publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for OpenEvolve. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does OpenEvolve have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
OpenEvolve has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is OpenEvolve actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 32 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does OpenEvolve use?
OpenEvolve ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are OpenEvolve's commits signed?
41% of the last 100 commits to OpenEvolve are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to OpenEvolve's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain OpenEvolve?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores OpenEvolve from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 7Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Surface 1
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#450 → #464)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#423 → #440)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#435 → #423)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#407 → #425)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 100 spots (#302 → #402)
2026-07-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#279 → #263)
2026-07-15
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.2/10
2026-07-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 137 spots (#412 → #275)
2026-07-15
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 33.0pts (20.4 → 53.4)
2026-07-14
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #412

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 50.2 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/openevolve.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/openevolve)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/openevolve"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/openevolve.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON