Opencage Geocoding MCP

MCP server for querying the OpenCage geocoding API from within LLMs

MCP Servers JavaScript Listed MIT

Is Opencage Geocoding MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 97%
Last push 8d ago
Compare Opencage Geocoding MCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: Opencage Geocoding MCP scores 59.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #713 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; 97% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Opencage Geocoding MCP could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Opencage Geocoding MCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/OpenCageData/opencage-geocoding-mcp, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-02. 97% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.3/10 (scanned Nov 7, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies3
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 3
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages Not linked

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 5.6/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Opencage Geocoding MCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Opencage Geocoding MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #386 MCP Imagenate 59.3 +0.1
  2. #387 CrowdSentinels AI MCP 59.3 +0.1
  3. #388 Opencage Geocoding MCP 59.2 this agent
  4. #389 Drawio MCP 59.2 ±0
  5. #390 MCP Sqlite Tools 59.1 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Opencage Geocoding MCP’s 59.2.

Where the 59.2 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

59.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Opencage Geocoding MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.5 / 25
0.7 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.9 below avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
0.7 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.0 / 20
4.8 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.9 / 20
1.7 below avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 48 spots (#766 → #718)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#781 → #750)
2026-10-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 36 spots (#790 → #754)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
51.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#388

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 8 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
19
Forks
2
Last Push
2026-11-02
8 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
23
Downloads (7d)
131
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▲2
was #715

Analysis

Activity Inputs

51.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
17.2 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.2 / 20

Common questions about Opencage Geocoding MCP

Opencage Geocoding MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Opencage Geocoding MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Opencage Geocoding MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Opencage Geocoding MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Opencage Geocoding MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Opencage Geocoding MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 8 days ago.
What license does Opencage Geocoding MCP use?
Opencage Geocoding MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Opencage Geocoding MCP's commits signed?
97% of the last 100 commits to Opencage Geocoding MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Opencage Geocoding MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Opencage Geocoding MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Opencage Geocoding MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Opencage Geocoding MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 34HVTrust 4Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Score 1
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 48 spots (#766 → #718)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#781 → #750)
2026-10-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 36 spots (#790 → #754)
2026-10-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 116 spots (#909 → #793)
2026-10-18
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.2pts (53.2 → 56.4)
2026-10-18
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 10pts (38 → 48)
2026-10-17
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#899 → #909)
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#881 → #898)
2026-10-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#858 → #868)
2026-10-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#806 → #858)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#795 → #806)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 44 spots (#840 → #796)
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#797 → #826)
2026-10-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 84 spots (#713 → #797)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 154 spots (#890 → #736)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.3pts (27.0 → 56.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #890
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#709 → #721)
2026-09-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 67 spots (#778 → #711)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 66 spots (#687 → #753)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#655 → #687)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 98 spots (#753 → #655)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#734 → #753)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#677 → #731)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#663 → #677)
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 467 spots (#1130 → #663)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 19.9pts (35.9 → 55.8)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#1094 → #1130)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#1067 → #1094)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 61 spots (#1006 → #1067)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#964 → #1006)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#930 → #964)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#885 → #930)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#837 → #885)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#812 → #837)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#788 → #812)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.6/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 394 spots (#1182 → #788)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 18.9pts (17.8 → 36.7)
2026-08-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1167 → #1183)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#1136 → #1164)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 59.2 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/opencage-geocoding-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/opencage-geocoding-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/opencage-geocoding-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/opencage-geocoding-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON