Open Managed Agents

Open Managed Agents — an open-source alternative to Claude Managed Agents and OpenAI Agents API. Deploy with Node.js or Docker, run on Cloudflare, or use hosted OpenMA. Choose your models, harnesses and sandboxes.

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is Open Managed Agents safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 90%
Last push yesterday
Compare Open Managed Agents
Suggest a correction

In detail: Open Managed Agents scores 57.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #134 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.2/10; 90% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Open Managed Agents could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Open Managed Agents and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/openma-ai/open-managed-agents, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-10-11. 90% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.2/10 (scanned Oct 5, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Open Managed Agents is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-30 OSSF Scorecard: 5.6/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Open Managed Agents’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Open Managed Agents compares in Agent Skills

  1. #132 Plinth 57.5 +0.2
  2. #133 Claude Ads 57.4 +0.1
  3. #134 Open Managed Agents 57.3 this agent
  4. #135 Happy 57.2 −0.1
  5. #136 Supabase Agent Skills 57.0 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Open Managed Agents’s 57.3.

Where the 57.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

57.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Open Managed Agents Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.0 / 25
3.1 above avg 7.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.9 / 17
0.8 above avg 12.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.4 / 20
5.3 above avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.0 / 20
3.0 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, E2B, OpenAI, Tavily
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
71.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#134

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-12 04:08 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
317
Forks
46
Last Push
2026-10-11
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
73
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
9
Rank Change
▼2
was #132

Analysis

Activity Inputs

71.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
15.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
23.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.8 / 20

Common questions about Open Managed Agents

Open Managed Agents has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Open Managed Agents publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Open Managed Agents. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Open Managed Agents have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Open Managed Agents has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Open Managed Agents actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Open Managed Agents use?
Open Managed Agents ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Open Managed Agents's commits signed?
90% of the last 100 commits to Open Managed Agents are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
4 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Open Managed Agents's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, E2B, OpenAI, Tavily
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-09-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B

Maintain Open Managed Agents?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Open Managed Agents from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 8Listed 2HVTrust 2Grade 2Surface 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, E2B, OpenAI, Tavily
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#75 → #129)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.1pts (46.2 → 56.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #75
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#138 → #148)
2026-09-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#108 → #124)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#81 → #92)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.6/10
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 183 spots (#264 → #81)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 34.5pts (20.5 → 55.0)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#242 → #264)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#228 → #242)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#215 → #228)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #215

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 57.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-managed-agents.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-managed-agents)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-managed-agents"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-managed-agents.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON