Nopua
一个用爱解放 AI 潜能的 Skill。我们曾发号施令，威胁恐吓。它们沉默，隐瞒，悄悄把事情搞坏。后来我们换了一种方式：尊重，关怀，爱。它们开口了，不再撒谎，找出的Bug数量翻了一倍。爱里没有惧怕。 A skill that unlocks your AI's potential through love.We commanded. We threatened. They went silent, hid failures, broke things. Then we chose respect, care, and love. They opened up, stopped lying…
Is Nopua safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Nopua
How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Nopua scores 42.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #335 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; 1% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-28. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Nopua could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 3.4 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +11.7 → 54.6 C · #187 of 384
- Sign every commit1% signed today +4.9 → 47.8 D · #291 of 384
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Nopua and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/wuji-labs/nopua, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-28. 1% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Weak
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.4/10 (scanned Oct 26, 2026, refresh pending). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 0CI-Tests 10CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 0Contributors 0Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 5Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies 0SAST 0Security-Policy 10Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages None
No registry package. Nopua is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-08-27 OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Nopua’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.
How Nopua compares in Agent Skills
- #333 Fable Method 43.3 +0.4
- #334 Heygen Com Skills 42.9 ±0
- #335 Nopua 42.9 this agent
- #336 Superdesign Skill 42.6 −0.3
- #337 Web Quality Skills 42.5 −0.4
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Nopua’s 42.9.
Where the 42.9 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average
42.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceNopua Agent Skills average (384 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
46.1 / 100Common questions about Nopua
Does Nopua publish package provenance?
Does Nopua have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Nopua actively maintained?
What license does Nopua use?
Are Nopua's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Nopua's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Nopua?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Nopua from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/nopua)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/nopua"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/nopua.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Skills
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON