Is Nanoclaw safe to use?

Nanoclaw has an HVTrust score of 65.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #56 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Nanoclaw?

Nanoclaw scores 65.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 30.8k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Nanoclaw

nanocoai/nanoclaw

A lightweight alternative to OpenClaw that runs in containers for security. Connects to WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Gmail and other messaging apps,, has memory, scheduled jobs, and runs directly on Anthropic's Agents SDK

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Nanoclaw safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 84%

Last push yesterday

Compare Nanoclaw

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Nanoclaw scores 65.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #56 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.0/10; 84% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Nanoclaw compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Nanoclaw’s 65.8.

Where the 65.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

65.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Nanoclaw Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

11.7 / 25

3.6 above avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.6 / 17

1.4 above avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.9 / 20

5.7 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.8 / 20

1.8 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 216 spots (#272 → #56)

2026-09-25

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 22.3pts (43.6 → 65.9)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Nanoclaw View Agent Skills Report missing data

96.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#56

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

30.8k

Forks

12.8k

Last Push

2026-09-25

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

175

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

371

Rank Change

was #56

Analysis

Activity Inputs

96.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

26.9 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

19.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

6.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026

Signed Commits

84%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 4

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Nanoclaw

Nanoclaw has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Nanoclaw publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Nanoclaw. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Nanoclaw have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Nanoclaw has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Nanoclaw actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Nanoclaw use?

Nanoclaw ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Nanoclaw's commits signed?

84% of the last 100 commits to Nanoclaw are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Declared

MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Nanoclaw's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

Maintain Nanoclaw?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Nanoclaw from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 216 spots (#272 → #56)

2026-09-25

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 22.3pts (43.6 → 65.9)

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 88 spots (#186 → #274)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 7.4pts (36.1 → 43.5)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #186

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#223 → #233)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#206 → #217)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#181 → #197)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#163 → #181)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#132 → #163)

2026-08-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.6/10

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 119 spots (#251 → #132)

2026-08-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 22.1pts (20.3 → 42.4)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#240 → #251)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 113 spots (#122 → #235)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#108 → #121)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #112

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/nanoclaw.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/nanoclaw)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/nanoclaw"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/nanoclaw.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON