Multi Gmail MCP

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade D Listed MIT
45.8/100
Rank #891 of 1320
Compare Multi Gmail MCP

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-13 · 22d ago
Recent change
Rank +8

Is Multi Gmail MCP safe? Multi Gmail MCP scores 45.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #891 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.9/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#875 → #891)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#817 → #875)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 317 spots (#1134 → #817)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
40.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#481

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 14:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 22 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
19
Forks
9
Last Push
2026-08-13
22 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
2
Downloads (7d)
86
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼16
was #875

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

45.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Multi Gmail MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.9 / 25
5.6 below avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.0 / 17
0.8 below avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.4 / 20
in line with avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.7 / 20
0.5 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

40.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
21.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
6.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 1, 2026
Signed Commits
5%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 1
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Multi Gmail MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Multi Gmail MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Multi Gmail MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Multi Gmail MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Multi Gmail MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Multi Gmail MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Multi Gmail MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 22 days ago.
What license does Multi Gmail MCP use?
Multi Gmail MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Multi Gmail MCP's commits signed?
4% of the last 100 commits to Multi Gmail MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Multi Gmail MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Multi Gmail MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-13
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain Multi Gmail MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Multi Gmail MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 10HVTrust 3Listed 1Score 1Fresh 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#875 → #891)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#817 → #875)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 317 spots (#1134 → #817)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 16.6pts (29.4 → 46.0)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1091 → #1134)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#1063 → #1091)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.9/10
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 218 spots (#1281 → #1063)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.4pts (16.1 → 29.5)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#1240 → #1260)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1204 → #1235)
2026-08-13
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 63 spots (#1269 → #1206)
2026-08-13
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.5pts (13.0 → 16.5)
2026-08-13
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 20pts (22 → 43)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 79 spots (#1189 → #1268)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1188

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 45.8 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/multi-gmail-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/multi-gmail-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/multi-gmail-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/multi-gmail-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON