MemOS

Self-evolving memory OS for LLM & AI Agents: ultra-persistent memory, hybrid-retrieval, and cross-task skill reuse, with

Memory & Knowledge TypeScript Grade C Listed Apache-2.0
62.0/100
Rank #328 of 1316
Compare MemOS

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-26 · 1d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is MemOS safe? MemOS scores 62.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #328 of 1316 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 85% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Memory & Knowledge

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#296 → #323)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#302 → #286)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#290 → #305)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
87.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#23

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-27 14:03 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-27

Activity & Reach

Stars
11.0k
Forks
1.0k
Last Push
2026-08-26
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
80
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
36
Rank Change
▼5
was #323

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Memory & Knowledge

62.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MemOS Memory & Knowledge average (44 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.4 / 25
in line with avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.3 below avg 12.1
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.7 / 17
in line with avg 12.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.6 / 20
2.1 above avg 17.6
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.7 / 20
3.9 below avg 13.6

Activity Inputs

87.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
23.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 26, 2026
Signed Commits
85%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 8
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 2
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is MemOS safe?

MemOS has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does MemOS publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MemOS. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MemOS have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MemOS has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MemOS actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does MemOS use?
MemOS ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MemOS's commits signed?
85% of the last 100 commits to MemOS are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MemOS appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
5 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
  • database
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MemOS?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MemOS from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 10Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Score 1
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#296 → #323)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#302 → #286)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#290 → #305)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#310 → #294)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#334 → #309)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#317 → #334)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#340 → #317)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#326 → #340)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 102 spots (#224 → #326)
2026-08-08
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (85 → 79)
2026-07-14
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10
2026-07-14
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 173 spots (#358 → #185)
2026-07-14
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 36.4pts (25.2 → 61.6)
2026-07-13
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #358

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.0 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/memos.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/memos)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/memos"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/memos.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON