MCP Virustotal
MCP server for VirusTotal API — analyze URLs, files, IPs, and domains with comprehensive security reports, relationship analysis, and pagination support.
Is MCP Virustotal safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare MCP Virustotal
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
- ASP.NET Core Debugger — MCP Server for AI Agents +0.1 higher
- MCP Shodan +0.1 higher
- Ros2 MCP same score
In detail: MCP Virustotal scores 50.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #922 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.4/10; 26% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Virustotal compares in MCP Servers
- #523 ASP.NET Core Debugger — MCP Server for AI Agents 50.7 +0.1
- #524 MCP Shodan 50.7 +0.1
- #525 MCP Virustotal 50.6 this agent
- #526 Ros2 MCP 50.6 ±0
- #527 JADX MCP Server 50.6 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Virustotal’s 50.6.
Where the 50.6 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
50.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Virustotal MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
54.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Virustotal
Does MCP Virustotal publish package provenance?
Does MCP Virustotal have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Virustotal actively maintained?
What license does MCP Virustotal use?
Are MCP Virustotal's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Virustotal's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Virustotal?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Virustotal from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-virustotal)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-virustotal"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-virustotal.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON