MCP Server Motherduck
Local MCP server for DuckDB and MotherDuck
Is MCP Server Motherduck safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare MCP Server Motherduck
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
- SearXNG HTTP MCP +0.1 higher
- Serpapi MCP +0.1 higher
- ASP.NET Core Debugger — MCP Server for AI Agents 0.1 lower
In detail: MCP Server Motherduck scores 50.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #919 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.0/10; 27% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Server Motherduck compares in MCP Servers
- #520 SearXNG HTTP MCP 50.9 +0.1
- #521 Serpapi MCP 50.9 +0.1
- #522 MCP Server Motherduck 50.8 this agent
- #523 ASP.NET Core Debugger — MCP Server for AI Agents 50.7 −0.1
- #524 MCP Shodan 50.7 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Server Motherduck’s 50.8.
Where the 50.8 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
50.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Server Motherduck MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
49.3 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Server Motherduck
Does MCP Server Motherduck publish package provenance?
Does MCP Server Motherduck have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Server Motherduck actively maintained?
What license does MCP Server Motherduck use?
Are MCP Server Motherduck's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Server Motherduck's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Server Motherduck?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Server Motherduck from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-motherduck)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-motherduck"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-motherduck.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON