Is MCP Server Couchbase safe to use?

MCP Server Couchbase has an HVTrust score of 81.0/100 (Grade A), ranked #87 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Server Couchbase?

MCP Server Couchbase scores 81.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 34 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Server Couchbase

couchbase/mcp-server-couchbase

Model Context Protocol server for Couchbase - connect AI agents and LLMs like Claude, Cursor, and Copilot to Couchbase/C

MCP Servers Python Grade A Listed Apache-2.0

81.0/100

Rank #87 of 1320

Compare MCP Server Couchbase

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-04 · 0d ago

Recent change

Scorecard +5

Is MCP Server Couchbase safe? MCP Server Couchbase scores 81.0/100 (Grade A), ranked #87 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.8/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#30 PaSympa Discord MCP — 81.2 (A) → #31 LibreNMS MCP — 81.0 (A) → #33 Memorylens MCP — 81.0 (A) → #34 Talkthrough MCP — 80.9 (A) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.

Recent Changes

2026-09-01

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.8/10

2026-09-01

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → A

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 121 spots (#209 → #88)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Server Couchbase View MCP Servers Report missing data

59.1

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#32

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-04

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

491

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼8

was #79

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

81.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Server Couchbase MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

19.7 / 25

10.1 above avg 9.6

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.4 / 17

1.6 above avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.6 / 20

5.4 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.3 / 20

1.0 above avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

59.1 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.3 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

17.6 / 25

CommunityFork signal

7.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

5.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 1, 2026

Signed Commits

99%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 6

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 0

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 7

SAST 10

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 9

Is MCP Server Couchbase safe?

Public supply-chain signals for MCP Server Couchbase are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but MCP Server Couchbase carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does MCP Server Couchbase publish package provenance?

Yes. MCP Server Couchbase's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does MCP Server Couchbase have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Server Couchbase has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Server Couchbase actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does MCP Server Couchbase use?

MCP Server Couchbase ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Server Couchbase's commits signed?

99% of the last 100 commits to MCP Server Couchbase are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Server Couchbase appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

OpenAI

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Server Couchbase?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Server Couchbase from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-01

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.8/10

2026-09-01

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → A

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 121 spots (#209 → #88)

2026-09-01

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 12.2pts (69.3 → 81.5)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#190 → #209)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#180 → #191)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#153 → #171)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#155 → #143)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #148

GitHub → PyPI: couchbase-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-couchbase.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-couchbase)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-couchbase"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-couchbase.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON