MCP Server Couchbase
Model Context Protocol server for Couchbase - connect AI agents and LLMs like Claude, Cursor, and Copilot to Couchbase/Capella
Is MCP Server Couchbase safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare MCP Server Couchbase
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MCP Server Couchbase scores 67.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #385 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.1/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Server Couchbase compares in MCP Servers
- #227 Email MCP 68.0 +0.5
- #228 Idea Reality MCP 68.0 +0.5
- #229 MCP Server Couchbase 67.5 this agent
- #230 Sfcc Dev MCP 67.5 ±0
- #231 ContextStream 67.4 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Server Couchbase’s 67.5.
Where the 67.5 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
67.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Server Couchbase MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
56.6 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Server Couchbase
Does MCP Server Couchbase publish package provenance?
Does MCP Server Couchbase have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Server Couchbase actively maintained?
What license does MCP Server Couchbase use?
Are MCP Server Couchbase's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Server Couchbase's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Server Couchbase?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Server Couchbase from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-couchbase)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-couchbase"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-couchbase.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON