Is MCP Klever Vm safe to use?

MCP Klever Vm has an HVTrust score of 60.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #577 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Klever Vm?

MCP Klever Vm scores 60.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 31 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Klever Vm

klever-io/mcp-klever-vm

MCP server for Klever blockchain smart contract development

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT

60.3/100

Rank #577 of 1328

Compare MCP Klever Vm

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-05-19 · 112d ago

Recent change

Grade Changed +8

Is MCP Klever Vm safe? MCP Klever Vm scores 60.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #577 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.1/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#311 MCP Sqlite Tools — 60.5 (C) → #312 Lumino MCP Server — 60.4 (C) → #314 Parallel Browser MCP — 60.2 (C) → #315 Cesium MCP — 60.1 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Improve maintenance to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.

Recent Changes

2026-09-07

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank rose 525 spots (#1096 → #571)

2026-09-07

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 19.8pts (40.6 → 60.4)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 112 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Klever Vm View MCP Servers Report missing data

21.7

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#313

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-05-19

112 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼6

was #571

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

60.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Klever Vm MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

16.4 / 25

6.5 above avg 9.9

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.1 / 17

0.9 below avg 12.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

4.5 / 20

7.7 below avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

5.6 / 20

1.3 below avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

21.7 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.0 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

9.4 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

3.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

3.1 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 4, 2026

Signed Commits

100%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 2

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 1

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is MCP Klever Vm safe?

MCP Klever Vm has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does MCP Klever Vm publish package provenance?

Yes. MCP Klever Vm's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does MCP Klever Vm have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Klever Vm has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Klever Vm actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 112 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does MCP Klever Vm use?

MCP Klever Vm ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Klever Vm's commits signed?

100% of the last 100 commits to MCP Klever Vm are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Klever Vm appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Redis

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

1 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Klever Vm's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-17

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

Maintain MCP Klever Vm?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Klever Vm from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-07

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank rose 525 spots (#1096 → #571)

2026-09-07

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 19.8pts (40.6 → 60.4)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1082 → #1096)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 41 spots (#1041 → #1082)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#1017 → #1041)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 57 spots (#960 → #1017)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 54 spots (#906 → #960)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 35 spots (#871 → #906)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 27 spots (#844 → #871)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#808 → #844)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 48 spots (#760 → #808)

2026-08-28

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 54 spots (#814 → #760)

2026-08-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.4pts (36.6 → 41.0)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#789 → #814)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 103 spots (#686 → #789)

2026-08-17

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#664 → #679)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#633 → #662)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #632

GitHub → npm: @klever/mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-klever-vm.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-klever-vm)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-klever-vm"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-klever-vm.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON