updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

MCP Klever Vm

klever-io/mcp-klever-vm

MCP server for Klever blockchain smart contract development

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is MCP Klever Vm safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 100%
Last push 130d ago
Compare MCP Klever Vm

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Klever Vm scores 59.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #657 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.1/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Klever Vm compares in MCP Servers

  1. #364 Drawio MCP 59.2 +0.1
  2. #365 Google Surf MCP 59.2 +0.1
  3. #366 MCP Klever Vm 59.1 this agent
  4. #367 JS Reverse MCP 58.9 −0.2
  5. #368 E Arveldaja MCP 58.9 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Klever Vm’s 59.1.

Where the 59.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

59.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Klever Vm MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
16.4 / 25
6.1 above avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.1 / 17
1.1 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
3.3 / 20
8.8 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.6 / 20
1.6 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve maintenance to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 130 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Klever Vm View MCP Servers Report missing data
19.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#366
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 130 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
31
Forks
5
Last Push
2026-05-19
130 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
30
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼3
was #654

Analysis

Activity Inputs

19.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
6.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
3.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 12, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 2
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 1
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about MCP Klever Vm

MCP Klever Vm has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does MCP Klever Vm publish package provenance?
Yes. MCP Klever Vm's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does MCP Klever Vm have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Klever Vm has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Klever Vm actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 130 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does MCP Klever Vm use?
MCP Klever Vm ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Klever Vm's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to MCP Klever Vm are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Klever Vm appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Klever Vm's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-08-17
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain MCP Klever Vm?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Klever Vm from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 18HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Stale 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 592 spots (#1239 → #647)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 43.0pts (16.3 → 59.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1239
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#624 → #634)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#585 → #602)
2026-09-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 525 spots (#1096 → #571)
2026-09-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 19.8pts (40.6 → 60.4)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1082 → #1096)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#1041 → #1082)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#1017 → #1041)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#960 → #1017)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#906 → #960)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#871 → #906)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#844 → #871)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#808 → #844)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#760 → #808)
2026-08-28
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 54 spots (#814 → #760)
2026-08-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.4pts (36.6 → 41.0)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#789 → #814)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 103 spots (#686 → #789)
2026-08-17
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#664 → #679)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#633 → #662)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #632
GitHub → npm: @klever/mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 59.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-klever-vm.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-klever-vm)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-klever-vm"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-klever-vm.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON