updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

MCP Funnel

chris-schra/mcp-funnel

Finally, a proxy that does what grep does for logs - filters out the noise. Stop carrying 70k tokens of tools you'll nev

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
16.0/100
Rank #1221 of 1283
Compare MCP Funnel

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2025-11-24 · 261d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is MCP Funnel safe? MCP Funnel scores 16.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1221 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 9% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-11-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#715 Chrome MCP Server — 16.0 (D) → #716 Time MCP — 16.0 (D) → #718 Pagecast — 15.9 (D) → #719 JustCall MCP Server — 15.7 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 76 spots (#1144 → #1220)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1142
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 261 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Funnel View MCP Servers Report missing data
18.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#717
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 261 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
155
Forks
14
Last Push
2025-11-24
261 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
7
Rank Change
=
was #1221

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

16.0 / 100 · 40.0% confidence

MCP Funnel MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
0.4 / 25
4.6 below avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
12.4 below avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.3 / 20
in line with avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

18.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
13.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
9%
of last 100 commits verified

Is MCP Funnel safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP Funnel is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does MCP Funnel publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Funnel. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Funnel have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for MCP Funnel. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is MCP Funnel actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 261 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does MCP Funnel use?
MCP Funnel ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Funnel's commits signed?
9% of the last 100 commits to MCP Funnel are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Funnel appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Funnel?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Funnel from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 76 spots (#1144 → #1220)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1142
GitHub → npm: mcp-funnel

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 16.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-funnel.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-funnel)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-funnel"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-funnel.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON